I don't know why I can't understand this, but here's the way I see it:
A bunch ( a very large number) of people, mainly women and children, are gassed/killed in a faraway country that's in the middle of a civil war. There is no absolute proof as to who actually did the killing.
So, the response is for another faraway country (the US) to punish the perpetrators (even though they don't know who they are), by bombing the country in which the original bunch of people were killed.
This will
A. Kill more people ?
B. Cost the US a lot more money?
C. Upset a lot more people?
D. Involve the US in another useless war?
E. All of the above.
I just don't get it. I come up with the answer "E". And if they were going to do it, which I wish they wouldn't, why are they waiting so long, and telling the world what they are going to do?
This must really be some complex stuff, because it's way over my head...
Bookmarks