Thanks to all you optical pros for the crash course you've given me here and at sci.med.vision. If info like yours was more widely disseminated, a lot of folks would be seeing better.
I thought I would relate you my glasses-buying saga to let you know how it has been for one consumer and to ask for your advice. I admit that I am picky - beyond merely "adapting" I would like to see as well as possible!
At age 46, I am confronting the aging of my eyes along with the rest of me. It is something we all go through if we are given leave to live this long. Nevertheless, I never expected it to be so difficult.
My ten-year-old glasses broke in two. My sister recommended an ophthalmologist. He was on vacation so I saw another doctor in his office. The prescription was
OD -5.75 +1.50 x75
OS -7.00 +1.50 x95
Add +1.50
I marched off to Lenscrafters. Why LC?
I didn't stick around the doctor's office to look at the frames because my eyes were so dilated I couldn't see them. Besides, I wasn't altogether pleased with my experience there. It seemed like an examination mill. The place was crammed with patients, and I sat a couple of hours in various parts of the office waiting for an exam which only lasted a couple of minutes. I had a lot of time to inspect the advertisements for Botox, which made me feel that vision was not their #1 concern.
I would have liked to have gone to a small local optician for my glasses. I am the kind of person who prefers the independent deli to the big supermarket.
Unfortunately, the small optical shops I know of around here are either dingy, stodgy and unfriendly, or glitzy, fashionable and snobbish.
Lenscrafters, by contrast, seemed welcoming. It is big and well-lit, with a large selection of frames. Best of all, customers are free to handle the frames and examine the prices.
It would be nice if opticians, even when they keep the frames in display cases, could at least give them price tags which are visible to people who are browsing. It gets wearying to have to keep asking, "Can I see that one? How much does it cost?"
I was also seduced by LC's one-hour policy (since I was now wearing crummy fifteen-year-old glasses) and money-back guarantee (since I was nervous about entering the world of multifocal lenses.)
Finally, the recommendation from Consumer Reports was reassuring.
So, LC made me progressive lenses. They didn't give me any choice of lens design or material. I asked why polycarbonate and didn't get much of an answer. As I found out later, those are the only progressive lenses they keep in stock.
They had explained to me that a large part of the lens would be blurry. Still, I was shocked by the experience of wearing them. A slim column down the middle is the only part of the view that's at all sharp, whether distant or near. The lenses are darker than my old high-index plastic ones, and seem wavy in spots.
I can read a newspaper fairly well, but with a book or a typed page I have to keep turning my head if I want the type to remain sharp. And I still have to take off my glasses to read very small writing, like that on maps.
I have been walking around for a month now with eyestrain and headaches, and my neck hurts from craning it into position to see through the tiny sweet spots.
I went back to the doctor. He increased the add from +1.50 to +2.00. I don't know whether he did this just to humor me. I did notice that looking through his machine at +1.50, I could read the smallest type on the card I was holding in front of me, while looking through the glasses with the same prescription, I couldn't.
When I got home I started looking up what you all have said on line. I realized that there is a lot more to glasses than I had imagined, especially when it comes to progressive lenses.
I returned to LC with my new scrip. They were not happy to see me. My conclusion is that their vaunted guarantee is a bit of a shuck. They did their best to talk me out of a remake. They even made me go home to get my old glasses to compare with the new ones. And if I wanted anything but polycarbonate lenses, the turnaround would be six weeks.
They did check the fit. I think it is all right - the clearest spots in both lenses do seem to line up. One of the managers mentioned she had an associate degree in opticianry. However, when I asked whether increasing the add would make the usable area of the lenses even smaller, she said no - despite what I have read online.
I ordered new lenses in high index plastic with a +2.00 add. Once again they offered me no choice of material. I heard an associate and a manager discuss whether it should be 1.56 or 1.67 index - they decided on 1.56. At that point I didn't feel like pressing for an explanation. I still don't know what the material, manufacturer or lens design is.
I am worried about weight because my glasses chronically slide down my nose. It is not an unusual nose, but it is rather broad and flat. LC replaced my nose pads with silicone ones, which helped but did not entirely solve the problem. I wonder why glasses don't automatically come with sticky nose pads. There must be millions of people whose glasses slip.
Anyway, I'm waiting out the six weeks. If you're still with me, here are my questions -
What is causing my discomfort? Polycarbonate? Cheap polycarbonate? Bad lens design? Or maybe I'm just a non-adapter to progressives?
Is there one add that is right for me, or is it a matter of judgment? Should I learn to live with +1.50, not being able to see things that are too small or close, in return for a wider field of view?
Under what circumstances would you recommend lined bifocals or trifocals? I notice that, according to the Optiboard poll, none of you wear them. Still I wonder - if trifocals were the hot new technology with which one could actually see through the whole lens, would we all be gung ho about it?
Oh yeah and, how do you keep glasses from slipping? (Whatever happened to cable earpieces anyway?)
Thanks for listening to my tale of woe!
Andy Z.
Bookmarks