Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: What is this refraction technique called?

  1. #1
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    space
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    291

    What is this refraction technique called?

    I have a friend that is an OD and he told me that for a lot of hyperopes doctors will put a little more plus into the distance in order to make it so that the add power is not so high. I asked him if this is called anything and he said he didn't think so. And So I was wondering if there's a way to ask "is this the pure prescription or the ______ prescription"?

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    usa
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    995
    Ask him what his remake rate is. I wouldn't want a doc to do that for glasses meant for full distance, green balance is always happier. I've never met anyone who likes to be over-plused, unless they never leave their house.

  3. #3
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,407
    Kwill is almost right. That's an improvement for him. :)

    The correct prescribing technique is indeed called "over-plussing". (It used to be called "hyperfocal distance" a thousand years ago...pupils and depth of focus and whatnot but forget I ever said this.)

    And he's right: overplussing in glasses is stupid. (Overplussing in contacts is...smart, when you're desperate, because...multifocals ain't awesome.)

    And he's right that the red-green balance/ bichrome/ duochrome is the ultimate way to get the final spherical endpoint.

    But I take issue with overminusing. No, R = G is the preferred endpoint. (Do you want to underplus a dude like Kwill so he has to tilt his head even further to see his Bud Light can? I didn't think so.)

    So Kwill is 3/4, which is very good.

  4. #4
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    space
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by drk View Post
    Kwill is almost right. That's an improvement for him. :)

    The correct prescribing technique is indeed called "over-plussing". (It used to be called "hyperfocal distance" a thousand years ago...pupils and depth of focus and whatnot but forget I ever said this.)

    And he's right: overplussing in glasses is stupid. (Overplussing in contacts is...smart, when you're desperate, because...multifocals ain't awesome.)

    And he's right that the red-green balance/ bichrome/ duochrome is the ultimate way to get the final spherical endpoint.

    But I take issue with overminusing. No, R = G is the preferred endpoint. (Do you want to underplus a dude like Kwill so he has to tilt his head even further to see his Bud Light can? I didn't think so.)

    So Kwill is 3/4, which is very good.
    And so over-plussing the distance is specifically meant to alleviate the add power? If so, what's the thinking behind this (as an optician I understand why keeping an add low is beneficial, but what's the thinking for ODs and MDs?)

  5. #5
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    usa
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    995
    I didn't say we should over minus people. But most people aren't going to give a "Yes, doc both sides of the red and green look exactly equal. I'll take green over slightly red every time.

  6. #6
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Earth
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    541
    Quote Originally Posted by drk View Post
    But I take issue with overminusing. No, R = G is the preferred endpoint. (Do you want to underplus a dude like Kwill so he has to tilt his head even further to see his Bud Light can? I didn't think so.)
    He didn't say anything about over-minusing.

    If you have dispensed glasses for any amount of time you can tell when someone's Rx got more plus power in comparison to their old Rx. Watch the customer put the glasses on and not see clearly. Look at their last Rx from 2 years ago and notice the doc bumped it up half a diopter plus. Tell them that doc increased their Rx a bit and it may take a couple days to adjust to, and that they are probably better off trying the Rx the next morning after they have had some time to rest their eyes.

    IF they come back in a week, I use flippers over their glasses with -0.25 and -0.50 in them and when they say they can see so much better I ask the doc to pull them back for a quick refraction and get it fixed.

    Over plus to keep the add down is a really bad idea.

  7. #7
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    space
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by NAICITPO View Post
    He didn't say anything about over-minusing.

    If you have dispensed glasses for any amount of time you can tell when someone's Rx got more plus power in comparison to their old Rx. Watch the customer put the glasses on and not see clearly. Look at their last Rx from 2 years ago and notice the doc bumped it up half a diopter plus. Tell them that doc increased their Rx a bit and it may take a couple days to adjust to, and that they are probably better off trying the Rx the next morning after they have had some time to rest their eyes.

    IF they come back in a week, I use flippers over their glasses with -0.25 and -0.50 in them and when they say they can see so much better I ask the doc to pull them back for a quick refraction and get it fixed.

    Over plus to keep the add down is a really bad idea.
    What is the doctor's thinking behind keeping the add down?

  8. #8
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Earth
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    541
    Quote Originally Posted by Prentice Pro 9000 View Post
    What is the doctor's thinking behind keeping the add down?
    I would guess they are trying to have less oblique astigmatism peripherally so their patient likes the glasses they make them better. Less add leads to wider fields of vision. But that is probably a better question for Drk.

  9. #9
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    space
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by NAICITPO View Post
    I would guess they are trying to have less oblique astigmatism peripherally so their patient likes the glasses they make them better. Less add leads to wider fields of vision. But that is probably a better question for Drk.
    yeah waiting for his take

  10. #10
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,407
    I don't know why they're stupid.

    "Which is better? 1. Best possible night driving vision and a +2.50 add, or 2. Punctum remotum at 13 feet and a +2.25 add?"

    (Hint: the answer is "1".)

  11. #11
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,407
    Quote Originally Posted by Kwill212 View Post
    I didn't say we should over minus people. But most people aren't going to give a "Yes, doc both sides of the red and green look exactly equal. I'll take green over slightly red every time.
    You should have taken the win, bro.

    I do RG bichrome on all patients with accommodation...most (like...90%) will see equality with the wheels of fortune at a specific 0.25 D position. For those that don't...there's always the dreaded +0.12 lens!

    But yeah, I'll give it to you. Technically accommodators would do better with the greenie and non-accommodators would do better with the reddy. (But I don't do RG on anyone 60 and up, anyway, because their lenses are too cloudy to make it work right.)

  12. #12
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    8
    This sounds like a misunderstanding to me.
    "He puts a little more plus".. compared to what?
    Many hyperops wear a weaker correction (compared to optimal) until they're 40. When presbyopia happens they suddenly realize they need a lot more for reading than regular people.
    When you give them their first PAL, if you're doing it right, you have to give them the max + for distance.
    Therefore, compared to their previous glasses, you give them "a little more plus"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Any thoughts on a short lens called Silor or a anti reflective coating called Vivix?
    By SpexAppeal in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 10-25-2011, 05:54 PM
  2. What is your favorite adjustment/repair/technique?
    By Striderswife in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-17-2009, 07:13 AM
  3. Correct Interviewing Technique ?
    By SRL in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 09-27-2007, 11:05 PM
  4. Lens cleaning technique prior to backside coating question
    By snowmonster in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-12-2007, 03:55 PM
  5. Help is needed with training technique for neutalising lenses
    By MarySue in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-28-2002, 08:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •