Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Prism Reference + Oblique Astigmatism

  1. #1
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    .
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    114

    Prism Reference + Oblique Astigmatism

    Just looking for some insight on PRP and induced prism. Let's say I have an Rx at -5.00 and my lens has a drop of 5mm to the PRP. That would be 0.5 x 5 = 2.5 base up induced prism at the pupil center. It seems adaptation isn't much of an issue if both eyes have relativley similar rx's and the induced prism is yoked.

    However if the patient has oblique astigmatism, horizontal prism is also induced as you move up. I've had a lot of oddball adaptation issues and most of them are oblique.... could this be one of those factors? Is the only solution to find a product with 0 drop from the fitting cross?

  2. #2
    OptiWizard
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    California
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    399
    The lab can put the oc anywhere that you request but will that solve your problem. If you put the oc at the fitting cross you will encounter more prism issues at the reading level.

  3. #3
    One eye sees, the other feels OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wauwatosa Wi
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,473
    Oscar,

    The in and out induced prism is not so much of a concern compared to up and down vertical imbalance (VI).

    Most astigmatism, excluding corneal disorders and surgery, have mirror symmetries in their cylinder axes, where the axes sum to 180 or 90 degrees, minimizing VI. For example,

    OD pl -2.00 x 60
    OS pl -2.00 x 120

    induces 0.00 VI at the PRP or reading depth.

    When the axes do not mirror each other,

    OD pl -2.00 x 60
    OS pl -2.00 x 60

    more than 1∆ VI is induced at a 12mm reading level and less than half that at a PRP with a 4mm drop. Likely tolerated. Separates might be best for higher degrees of VI.

    Hope this helps,

    Robert Martellaro
    Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. - Richard P. Feynman

    Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test before the lesson.



  4. #4
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    .
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    114
    Thank you everyone this makes a lot more sense. So will this actually be an issue for people who do not have symmetrical axes? What do we do in those cases?

  5. #5
    One eye sees, the other feels OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wauwatosa Wi
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,473
    Oscar,

    I suggested separates (SVNO), but there are many other possible solutions with varying configurations and tweaks. Try this search for more details. Hint: In most cases, if it's not broken (asymptomatic), don't fix it.

    site:optiboard.com "multifocals" "anisometropia"

    Best regards,

    Robert Martellaro
    Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. - Richard P. Feynman

    Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test before the lesson.



  6. #6
    OptiWizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    space
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    304
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Martellaro View Post
    Oscar,

    The in and out induced prism is not so much of a concern compared to up and down vertical imbalance (VI).

    Most astigmatism, excluding corneal disorders and surgery, have mirror symmetries in their cylinder axes, where the axes sum to 180 or 90 degrees, minimizing VI. For example,

    OD pl -2.00 x 60
    OS pl -2.00 x 120

    induces 0.00 VI at the PRP or reading depth.

    When the axes do not mirror each other,

    OD pl -2.00 x 60
    OS pl -2.00 x 60

    more than 1∆ VI is induced at a 12mm reading level and less than half that at a PRP with a 4mm drop. Likely tolerated. Separates might be best for higher degrees of VI.

    Hope this helps,

    Robert Martellaro
    huh... learn something new everyday. I was always looking of cylinder causing VI, but never thought of whether or not they have symmetry between the two lenses. You just upped my game!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Experts needed for a ELI 5 on oblique astigmatism
    By azhanli22 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2020, 08:09 PM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-14-2012, 07:23 PM
  3. oblique cross prism calculation
    By rob in uk in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-17-2009, 03:58 AM
  4. resolving oblique astigmatism into V & H components.
    By paulj in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-03-2008, 08:40 AM
  5. Faceshield & oblique astigmatism
    By dcroteau in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-04-2005, 07:51 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •