Have a patient who has been very happily wearing Auto 2 fixed 13 for quite a while and in Transitions Vantage....tried to order nearly identical pair for her in Transitions Xtractive Polar, but it is not available through VSP. How does Auto 2 - 13 compare to Array 2 - 13, which is available through vsp in transitions xtractive polar? I am thinking it is fairly similar, but really don't have experience with the Array products. Advice much appreciated!
https://www.2020mag.com/courses/HOYA...ce%20Guide.pdf
It looks like they offer very similar technologies. Both are backside freeform progressives with fixed corridor profiles. My question to you would be why chose The Array over any other lens in the same class? Why not an IOT house brand fixed 13 PAL? Why not a Zeiss Lite H fixed 14? (if thats in the same category IDK)? Most modern PALs are a lot more similar than you might think. AND your client has much more brain plasticity than you give them credit for.
Optical Cross: n. crucifixion apparatus used by the New Jersey State Board.
"It is not knowing, but the love of learning, that characterizes the scientific [person]." -Charles Sanders Peirce
"A concept is a brick. It can be used to build a courthouse of reason. Or it can be thrown through the window. -Gilles Deleuze
I had a patient recently who was wearing an array 2 variable and I put her in an Auto 2 variable and she was happy with it. I'm sure you could do the opposite with matching corridor lengths.
Why choose the Array over some other lenses:Originally Posted by Kujiradesu
1. The Array might be less expensive
2. Hoya has some of the most durable AR coatings
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks