Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Professional fee-based ophthalmic lens pricing

  1. #1
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,432

    Professional fee-based ophthalmic lens pricing

    Hey, I wrote this a long time ago, and I think it's pretty good!


    Professional fee-based ophthalmic lens pricing


    It’s illuminating to consider how many professional services opticians perform when providing ophthalmic lenses:

    • interview of the patient and assessment of optical wants and needs
    • interpretation of the written prescription
    • evaluation of the previous correction
    • lens design
    • measurements
    • supply of materials
    • quality control processes
    • dispensing and fitting of prosthesis
    • patient education
    • Aftercare such as periodic adjustments and maintenance, warranties and manufacturers’ defects, management of prescription non-adaptation and prescribing errors.


    The vision industry has adopted the term "dispensing” to globally describe the professional services rendered by optical professionals. As can be seen, “dispensing” grossly under-represents the level of service involved.

    In my opinion, optical professionals have the right and responsibility to charge for their time and expertise. In that regard they are no different than any other professional—plumber, personal trainer, or physician.

    Physicians and the insurance industry have classified and graded aspects of physicians’ service for the purpose of establishing equitable third-party reimbursement. In general, the following division has been made:
    medical history level
    examination level
    medical decision-making complexity

    Essentially this means time spent interviewing a patient, time spent doing physical work, and expertise applied devising a planlogical and very straightforward.

    I believe this paradigm translates well to optical services:

    • Interviewing/qualifying a patient is akin to medical history, and can be done, for example, by questionnaire amplified by interaction with an optician.
    • Measuring, dispensing, adjusting, and maintenance is a technical skill not unlike physical examination.
    • Interpreting a prescription and designing an ophthalmic lens is professional judgement and expertise.



    What would be the relative value of each component of optical professional service? Consider this example:
    Interview services: 15%
    Technical services: 50%
    Interpretation &Lens design: 35%

    This represents a rough 50/50 allocation between “technical skills” and “cognitive skills/people skills”.


    Towards professional fee-based pricing for ophthalmic lenses

    Let's further assume that an ophthalmic product’s retail price can be broken down to the simple formula:


    Retail price = Cost of goods sold + Professional fee

    Expanding the formula:
    Retail price = Cost of goods sold + 15% of professional fee for interview + 50% of professional fee for technical services + 35% of professional fee for lens design services

    The formula above is an appropriate way of establishing ophthalmic lens fees. It also is a formula that can be:

    • directly adjusted for increase in labor costs not only cost of goods sold
    • instructive in correctly setting fees for multiple pairs or promotions by analyzing amount of service involved


    • helpful for analyzing profitability of vision care contracts


    Traditionally optical customers have "package-purchased" professional services with optical goods. Newer market forces such as internet optical supply houses, low-service discount opticals, and low-reimbursing vision plans “unbundle the package”-- goods are often sold with minimal or sometimes no appreciable service. Perhaps the most critical marketplace advantage available today to the independent optician is professionalism and expertise.

    While I’m not sure the consumer is yet ready for retail lens prices itemized as cost of goods sold and professional fees, I do believe there are strategic and even job-satisfaction benefits from internally quantifying professional fees when pricing ophthalmic lenses. In a future article, real-world application of professional fee-based ophthalmic lens pricing will be considered.

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder optical24/7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Down on the Farm
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,832
    You’re parroting Chris’ exact sentiments!

    And, no, consumers are not ready to pay “cost + service fees.” You know as I do, how much you would have price your “services”. You would have to list a price similar to a plumber or electrician’s hourly fee. If you did that, I could open across the street from you, charge the same price as you, but advertise “free service” or “services included” and sift your clients away.

    I didn’t comment in the other thread about add-ons, but nobody likes “add-ons”. And itemizing each and every enhancement/benefit (better words to use than add-on), only invite scrutiny, similar to your cost + scenario. It’s way better to bundle options into one complete price. It’s much easier to sell that way.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2016, 01:52 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2013, 06:46 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-27-2013, 03:11 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-27-2013, 02:26 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2013, 05:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •