Originally Posted by
optimensch
So. Have you reread the article you posted. It is about "ripoffs" in our industry, including, apparently, Warby Parker.
It's about Luxottica. Can you show me where he mentions Warby? I see it once, when he says this:
“You can get amazingly good frames, with a Warby Parker level of quality, for $4 to $8,” Butler said. “For $15, you can get designer-quality frames, like what you’d get from Prada.”
So his reference to Warby is to imply that Lux is a ripoff. After all, if you're going to say someone is a rip off, you need to define an alternative. And so he does. He makes his point.
Bookmarks