Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Science or larceny ?

  1. #1
    Master OptiBoarder rbaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Gold Hill, OR
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    4,357

    Science or larceny ?

    Is this yet another new method to isolate the fool from his/her hard earned cash?

    Neurolens and SightSync. Check it out here: https://www.neurolenses.com/
    Last edited by rbaker; 05-10-2018 at 06:26 AM.

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Gold Supporter
    OptiBoard Silver Supporter

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    2,087
    Direct to consumer marketing and I haven't heard about it in any medical journal or even optiboard? I'll vote fraud.

  3. #3
    One eye sees, the other feels. OptiBoard Gold Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wauwatosa Wi
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,014
    Quote Originally Posted by rbaker View Post
    Is this yet another new method to isolate the fool fromhis/her hard earned cash?

    Neurolens and SightSync. Check it out here: https://www.neurolenses.com/
    Science, but with a very small audience.

    https://visionhelp.wordpress.com/201...ressive-prism/
    Roberts Optical Ltd.
    Wauwatosa Wi.
    www.roberts-optical.com
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. - Richard P. Feynman

  4. #4
    Ghost in the OptiMachine OptiBoard Silver Supporter Quince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Sebago ME
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    1,054
    I like how the first FAQ is "Why isn't this covered by insurance?"

    This is what I found most interesting in figuring out what the lens does- since it is not spelled out for us:

    "There are no known, lasting, negative side effects from using neurolenses; however, some patients may experience a slight disorientation the first time they try them on. Because neurolenses are adjusting the way your eyes communicate with your brain, they may take a short time to get used to. Once you have become accustomed to this change, there are no known, lasting, negative side effects. (The adaptation process is similar but may be stronger than that of adjusting to progressive lenses for the first time)."

    .....what?


    " When the misalignment is corrected with neurolenses, your visual system doesn’t need to work as hard, relieving your symptoms."

    ....ah-huh.
    Have I told you today how much I hate poly?

  5. #5
    Master OptiBoarder AngeHamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    2,078
    Izon 2.0.
    I'm Andrew Hamm and I approve this message.

  6. #6
    OptiBoard Professional OptiBoard Bronze Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    wisconsin
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    162
    Dr. Karpecki is well published, so I respect his opinion.

    To my knowledge, this is the first progressive prism lens. The theory behind the technology is sound. Time will tell if patients don't "eat" the prism and it loses effectiveness over time.

  7. #7
    Master OptiBoarder rbaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Gold Hill, OR
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    4,357
    Quote Originally Posted by pknsbeans View Post
    Dr. Karpecki is well published, so I respect his opinion.

    To my knowledge, this is the first progressive prism lens. The theory behind the technology is sound. Time will tell if patients don't "eat" the prism and it loses effectiveness over time.
    Holy crap! As if we ain't got enough "issues" with progressive lenses we are going to add prism to the equation.

    Well, back in the day, we found that "SV computer lenses" with just a hint of prism were of no noticeable benefit to the patient. Didn't sell in subsequent glasses. Another corpse of road kill along the eye care highway.

  8. #8
    Master OptiBoarder AngeHamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    2,078
    It looks from the website like you need to invest in a specialized piece of fitting equipment to dispense this lens. That's always a red flag for me.
    I'm Andrew Hamm and I approve this message.

  9. #9
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    7,928
    It's crap. Don't worry.

    Here's how you can tell, without even bothering to break it down:

    "Neuro-" anything. Mysterious. Powerful. Scary.

    The idea of progressive prism is neat, however. Is that do-able, now?

  10. #10
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    usa
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    496
    So is this just base in prism in the corridor and near? Wouldn't adjust the near PD with a variable inset progressive accomplish the same thing without the prism needed?

    edit- the more I think about this the more wrong I think I am....

  11. #11
    OptiBoard Professional OptiBoard Bronze Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    wisconsin
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    162
    IMO it sounds useful for SV wearers that have binocular vision issues at near. Instead of prescribing an add power for someone with convergence excess/insufficiency and no accommodative issue, a progressive prism COULD be useful.

  12. #12
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Savannah Ga
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    8
    "Overstimulation of the trigeminal nerve...."
    Last edited by Skol; 08-04-2020 at 11:48 AM.

  13. #13
    Rising Star walleye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Lansdale, PA
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    348
    Is that Kodak progressive lens with the base in prism still made? I see many older patients with very high exophoria at near. Sometimes around 12-16 base in and clearly seen on a near cover test. So base in prism at near would be well tolerated.

  14. #14
    Master OptiBoarder tx11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    822
    Alright people..I was just informed that we may begin using this lens/instrument. Any updates...experiences?

  15. #15
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by AngeHamm View Post
    It looks from the website like you need to invest in a specialized piece of fitting equipment to dispense this lens. That's always a red flag for me.
    I think I still have a Grolman Fitting Device if anyone wants to fit AO Ultravue lenses.
    Last edited by waynegilpin; 08-09-2020 at 10:24 AM.

  16. #16
    Master OptiBoarder AngeHamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by waynegilpin View Post
    I think I still have a Grolman Fitting Device is anyone wants to fit AO Ultravue lenses.
    I have a doctor friend who still uses their iZon machine as an autorefractor.
    I'm Andrew Hamm and I approve this message.

  17. #17
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    7,928
    I've had extensive discussions with the representatives of this company.

    In a nutshell, it's a rip-off. Sorry.

    Here's who it would work for: 1. the convergence-insufficient presbyope (rare, rare), 2. the convergence-insufficient/accommodative insufficient (CI/AI) (pediatric cases, usually).

    The rest is fairy dust.

    And no special diagnostic equipment is needed. Traditional methods would be great. But they hook you with the expensive equipment, plus you pay them on each lab job.

    As was said upthread, they have purchased Kodak's old patent (I called Kodak) for variable prism in the near portion of a progressive. It has a maximum of a couple of prism diopters, too, so don't expect more than about 3^ BI total, which is enough for mild/ moderate cases.


    Having said that, it would have some application in some cases. But they have created a "syndrome" (like everyone else) and are selling the "cure". It's highly, highly, highly dishonest. There's a sucker OD (and I've heard sucker OMDs) born every minute. Seems like you work for one.

    If your boss wants to talk to me about it, let me know. I can back this up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Science behind progressives?
    By 12345 in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-29-2013, 01:13 PM
  2. science fiction.
    By Mizikal in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-07-2010, 07:36 AM
  3. Medjugorje: Why can't science explain it?
    By Chairtime in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 11-17-2006, 09:14 PM
  4. Ask not what science can do for you ...
    By rinselberg in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-04-2006, 10:04 PM
  5. ocular science
    By JJ in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-28-2002, 09:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
OptiBoard is proudly sponsored by:
Younger Optics and Vision Equipment