Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 'Slipperiness' of coatings

  1. #1
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    England
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    48

    Wave 'Slipperiness' of coatings

    Hello,

    We are looking for a test of actual 'slipperiness', rather than just contact angle. We are producing superhydrophobic AR coatings, but realise that the contact angle is only related to 'slipperiness' for a particular top-coat material. the contact angle is useful to us for establishing monitoring of our processes, but 'slipperiness' is, we think, more fundamental to making the coatings superior to normal hydrophobic coatings.

    Consequently, we wondered if anyone has any information on how to measure this attribute directly. We have heard of an inclined plane method, and also that there is an 'ease of cleaning' test devised by Colts.

    Many thanks, if you are able to help.

    Best Regards,

    Falstaff.

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder rbaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Gold Hill, OR
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    4,401
    Here is what you are looking for.

    ASTM D1894 - Standard Test Method for Static and Kinetic Coefficients of Friction of Plastic Film and Sheeting

  3. #3
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Blue Jumper We chose to use a material that had already been proven in the medical ..............

    The surface of a unprotected AR coating looks like the Rocky Mountains under a microscope, where this irregular surface reflects the light. Seen under the microscope, the valleys would collect dirt and facial grease that was hard to remove.

    We worked at it and came up with a solution that actually worked. By filling these valleys with a transparent media that would still reflect the light as wanted; we created a way that would block the dirt from penetrating into those areas.


    Over the years, all these coatings that came on the market from different suppliers that were claiming a better contact angle than the next one, being more slippery than the next one, all forgot the original duty of such coatings, to prevent dirt and grease from reaching the bottom of the valley.

    So the contact angle, and being more or less slippery, is a big put on and has nothing to do with original idea of locking out the hard to remove dirt or grease, as explained above.

    We chose to use a material that had already been proven in the medical surgery field and that could be converted for the use on AR coatings where it works well, and can be seen at:

    http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/Courses/ce435/Polysiloxanes/


    Last edited by Chris Ryser; 12-05-2015 at 06:06 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. EMI Coatings
    By sandeepgoodbole in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-30-2007, 06:53 AM
  2. Anitreflective coatings and UV coatings
    By psykosis in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-18-2007, 08:03 PM
  3. UV coatings
    By Sheryl in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-10-2006, 10:12 AM
  4. "Generic AR coatings vs. Premium AR coatings"
    By misunderstood in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-26-2005, 08:47 AM
  5. Help with AR coatings
    By EdSheridan in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-23-2001, 10:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •