Reading further on in that thread
Says to me trifocals and only trifocals for presbyopic pilotsIf you also need correction for distance vision then you move into
"bifocal" country. I reached that point about ten years ago. I
tried bifocals. I carefully positioned the line so it would fall
at the top of the panel. It didn't work! The panel was too close
to see well through the upper distance vision part of the glasses
and it was too far away to see well through the lower "reading"
part of the glasses. I could land, and read charts, but I couldn't
see the instruments clearly.
But reading that whole thread makes me think about turning around the next time I see a pilot with grey hair and wearing glasses if I don't see a line
When you look through the lower corner of the lenses
it distorts everything. The runway looked higher than it was and
at an angle to its alignment. I was consistently landing about
two feet above the runway and settling on rather firmly! :-) I
i wear progressives (american optical omni-vision plus). it is true that the
peripheral part is 'unfocused'. it is also true that peripheral cues aid in
landing. but i don't think the peripheral cues need to be 'solidly in focus'
to help. at least, i like to delude myself that i can still grease 'em in
occassionally.
Landings have never been my strong point. Perhaps that's a contributing
factor. How does one tell? Other than by getting a nonprogressive
prescription, spending enough time with them to become natural with them,
and see if landings improve?
The first time I brought the nose up to land (at night) while weating
progressives I saw two diverging runways. I yanked the glasses off and
threw them in the back seat. Then, I made a safe landing.
Bookmarks