In my simple mind, I see no reason to not use tribrid in any application (in which it is available) over trivex or 1.60. Seems like a wonderful combo of both.
I really appreciate all you guys sharing your experience. So guess it isn't a poly killer, I can get some pretty good "non" branded ARs finally, some that stand up to Zeiss and maybe even Crizal... kind of anyway.
You can definitely get some non-branded ARs that are just a good as Crizal -- and get them on Tribrid.
I would love Tribrid to be a poly killer, but in order to do that the price will have to go down. It's tough, light, has a relatively high Abbe value, and is easy to edge.
Don't know how I didn't remember this from previous processing, but this is the worst smelling lens EVER. So bad... Had to strike up an incense match during edging and that hardly helped. Keep this in mind if you have a lab without a door!
Have I told you today how much I hate poly?
On the off chance that jefe was actually cutting something different and doesn't just have calloused olfactory sensation (don't we all?) does everyone else cut on high index settings also (water flow throughout the edging process is what I'm talking about, I run a Santinelli)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks