Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Billing binocular vision evaluation...

  1. #1
    Eyes eastward... Uilleann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,241

    Billing binocular vision evaluation...

    For any of the billing guru's here: We have a pediatric doc who comes in a couple days each month to work on the tiny humans in our practice. But she doesn't seem to code each of her binoc eval visits consistently. Wondering for those of you with a similar doc or who offer this type of service, what code do you find appropriate for the visit itself? We're assuming a 99 (as opposed to a 92 as it *seems* medically indicated), but of course the diagnosis will have to consistently reflect that. Is there some other code we should be aware of perhaps? A 6 code maybe?

    Cheers!

    Bri~

  2. #2
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,407
    Depends on the purpose of the visit.

    If it's considered "routine" (and that's a whole discussion right there), then she would use the routine exam codes. If there is a medically necessary reason, then the E/M or ophthalmological codes.

    For the "sensorimotor exam" there is a special diagnostic procedure code (if the sensorimotor exam definition fits the service), and it reimburses about $40. If it's a routine case, then the patient pays out of pocket. If it's medically necessary, you'd need a pretty good diagnosis code to get it to work. http://www.aapos.org/client_data/fil...approved04.pdf

  3. #3
    Eyes eastward... Uilleann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,241
    Quote Originally Posted by drk View Post
    Depends on the purpose of the visit.

    If it's considered "routine" (and that's a whole discussion right there), then she would use the routine exam codes. If there is a medically necessary reason, then the E/M or ophthalmological codes.

    For the "sensorimotor exam" there is a special diagnostic procedure code (if the sensorimotor exam definition fits the service), and it reimburses about $40. If it's a routine case, then the patient pays out of pocket. If it's medically necessary, you'd need a pretty good diagnosis code to get it to work. http://www.aapos.org/client_data/fil...approved04.pdf
    Cool. Thanks Doc. Generally speaking, these visits are post-routine visit, and are often suggested consults from our two other ODs. (Not referrals per se if I remember the correct terminology, as we're not completely transferring care to her...and it's the same office location.) My thought was that it should probably be a 99 visit, with the appropriate ICD attached to justify the medical billing. Just trying to be as consistent and 'audit-proof' as possible here.

    Appreciate the feedback!

    Bri~

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Binocular Vision Help
    By uwstudent in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-20-2012, 02:54 PM
  2. Performance Evaluation
    By MrsFoley in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-13-2006, 08:17 PM
  3. Should Mono or Binocular PD'd Be taken on Single Vision & Bifocal lenses??
    By eyesonu38 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 09-18-2005, 11:22 AM
  4. OptiBoard Book Review: Binocular Anomalies: Diagnosis and Vision Therapy
    By Steve Machol in forum OptiBoard News and Announcements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2002, 01:49 PM
  5. 'Binocular Anomalies: Diagnosis and Vision Therapy', by Griffen and Grisham
    By Steve Machol in forum OptiBoard Book Reviews
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-12-2002, 01:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •