I don't think you understood my point. Regardless of the scenario, my imagination led me to believe that light comes in discrete packets ...before reading about corpuscles.
Do you know what the difference is between getting something & just getting something done? It's going beyond what is refined. You'll have to forgive me for trying to learn. I'd most certainly rather question something & be wrong than take something for granted only to question it later.
We never got a reference book as to why nature works the way it does & we never will get a reference book as to why nature works the way it does
So maybe you should think twice about what you believe to be true, & reconsider opinions like mine.
You should be nice to your neighbors anyway
You can't view science as "set in stone." It's one of the most cumulative disciplines. If there weren't people like me questioning it, it wouldn't go anywhere.
*Let's just assume my theory was correct.
Photons don't really have "various masses" though, do they? I mean, one type of particle has one mass value for that type of particle. In other words, particles that gain or lose mass would then become some other type of particle.
^Does this contradict the idea of the higgs boson (God particle)?
Bookmarks