If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I assume you mean that when he looks through the intermediate or near portion he feels he has clearer vision. is this what you are trying to articulate? If so, I would grab some loose lenses from an exam room and see if his vision is better when you add (or reduce, we don't know his Rx) power. If he says he notices a difference, check your measurements- if they are spot on then see if the Dr will double check his refraction.
"Strictly speaking, there are no enlightened beings; only enlightened activity." -Shunryu Suzuki
Another thing to consider is progressive type. If the patient was previously in a compact progressive and you switched them to a full length corridor they would have to tilt their head more than they are used to.
Mark up the lenses and see if the fitting cross is in front of the pupil. If not, raise the frame by adjusting the nosepads if it has them and check the temples for appropriate fit. Next, check the vertex distance. It should be 13mm or less. Check the pantoscopic tilt. It should be 10-12 degrees (more for a progressive than for a standard pair).
Wesley S. Scott, MBA, MIS, ABOM, NCLE-AC, LDO - SC & GA
“As our circle of knowledge expands, so does the circumference of darkness surrounding it.” -Albert Einstein
Mark up the lenses and see if the fitting cross is in front of the pupil. If not, raise the frame by adjusting the nosepads if it has them and check the temples for appropriate fit. Next, check the vertex distance. It should be 13mm or less. Check the pantoscopic tilt. It should be 10-12 degrees (more for a progressive than for a standard pair).
But...even if the Rx is appropriate strength, and the position is found low, increasing the pantoscopic tilt will effectively make the eye reach a point *higher* in the corridor, exacerbating the situation.
But...even if the Rx is appropriate strength, and the position is found low, increasing the pantoscopic tilt will effectively make the eye reach a point *higher* in the corridor, exacerbating the situation.
Rather - retro may be indicated.
B
Barry, that's why I suggested the procedures in that order. We don't know yet what is causing all of the blur. It could easily be a combination of problems. A poorly fit frame is often poorly fit in more than one regard. Seg low, pads splayed too much, temple bends too loose, panto not adjusted. When rookies make mistakes, they tend to make more than one.
Wesley S. Scott, MBA, MIS, ABOM, NCLE-AC, LDO - SC & GA
“As our circle of knowledge expands, so does the circumference of darkness surrounding it.” -Albert Einstein
Comment