Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Zeiss clobbers Signet Armorlite(Essilor)

  1. #1
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Down in a hole!
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    13,079

    Zeiss clobbers Signet Armorlite(Essilor)

    It looks like the Kodak Unique lens has seen its last day.

    http://theopticalvisionsite.com/lens...-legal-ruling/

    Any other info on this ruling?

    Bravo to Zeiss!

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder kat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Duluth
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,121
    What happens to the big E??
    I came, I saw, I left

  3. #3
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Too bad Zeiss has never been friendly at licensing their technology, but it means it more competition. Which we all need.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fezz View Post
    It looks like the Kodak Unique lens has seen its last day.

    http://theopticalvisionsite.com/lens...-legal-ruling/
    Any other info on this ruling?

    Bravo to Zeiss!

  4. #4
    Objection! OptiBoard Gold Supporter shanbaum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Manchester, CT USA
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    2,976
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick777 View Post
    Too bad Zeiss has never been friendly at licensing their technology, but it means it more competition. Which we all need.
    I'm having trouble following the logic here... how does the grant of a monopoly (that's what a patent is - a time-limited monopoly) enhance competition?

  5. #5
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Braunschweig Germany
    Occupation
    Lens Manufacturer
    Posts
    116

  6. #6
    Objection! OptiBoard Gold Supporter shanbaum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Manchester, CT USA
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    2,976
    That document doesn't tell you anything about the principal rulings in the case. There is an "Amended Judgement" and a "Order Granting Zeiss' Motion for a Permanent Injunction." Those were just filed yesterday and don't appear to be freely available on the net yet. They are on PACER but there is a charge for accessing them there. Long and short of it is, Zeiss was awarded damages, attorney's fees, and an injunction barring Signet from making the Unique (or any "no more than colorably different" lens).

  7. #7
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Down in a hole!
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    13,079
    Thank you for the insight Shanbaum.

  8. #8
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    BeeEffEee
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    430
    Kodak Unique SD will be on the market on Friday. No idea what that means, but that's the response from my rep.

  9. #9
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    IN MY HOUSE
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    24
    Zeiss Prevails in Patent Infringement Suit Against Signet, as Court Orders Signet to Pay Triple Damages and Pull its Kodak Unique Lens From Market

    SAN DIEGO—The five-year old patent infringement lawsuit between spectacle lens makers Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH and Signet Armorlite finally concluded Monday in Zeiss’ favor when a federal court judge tripled the amount of damages a jury had awarded Zeiss and ordered Signet to pull its Kodak Unique progressive lens from distribution.

    The case has drawn widespread attention throughout the optical industry because it concerns the licensing of patents for backside progressive lenses, a fast growing product category.

    According to documents filed in the U.S. District Court’s Southern District of California on Aug. 6, the Court granted Zeiss’ motion that it be awarded “enhanced damages” of $2,054,892 in addition to the compensatory damages of $684,964 awarded to Zeiss by the jury in April. The jury had ruled that Signet’s Kodak Unique lens had infringed on Zeiss’ U.S. Patent No. 6,089,713, which covers a “spectacle lens with spherical lens with spherical front side and multifocal back side and process for its production.” Signet was producing Kodak Unique under a licensing agreement with Seiko Epson.

    In awarding the enhanced damages to Zeiss, the Court supported Zeiss’ claim that “Signet never investigated the scope of the patent and never formed a good faith belief that the patent was invalid or not infringed,” and did not obtain a “competent” legal opinion on the whether it would infringe on Zeiss’ patent, relying instead on the opinions of Signet’s optical engineering manager and vice president for research and development.

    The Court also issued a permanent injunction against Signet which required the company to “remove and recall all Kodak Unique lenses from the marketplace” within 14 days and turn them over to Zeiss, as well as “any other lens product that is no more than colorably different.”

    Judge Dana M. Sabraw, who presided over the case, rejected Signet’s motions for a new trial or a retrial, effectively concluding the lawsuit, which Zeiss filed against Signet in May, 2007. Signet Armorlite was acquired by Essilor International in 2010.

    VMail will continue to report on developments related to the case and its potential impact on lens manufacturers.

    This was in today's Vision Council e-News Bulletin.

  10. #10
    Eyes eastward... Uilleann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,249
    So they're going after the same patent design that Shamir touts as their baby as well - but they weren't named in this suit? My Shamir rep cold called today actually and I asked him if he'd heard. He had - and sounded a bit unsettled by it. They hadn't heard about any legal ramifications "so far" at least. Curious...

  11. #11
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Quote Originally Posted by shanbaum View Post
    I'm having trouble following the logic here... how does the grant of a monopoly (that's what a patent is - a time-limited monopoly) enhance competition?
    Because Essilor has so much of the market. Anything out of Essilors hands will hurt them, and help everyone else.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. FTC approves Essilor takeover of Signet Armorlite
    By KITT in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-19-2010, 03:50 PM
  2. ESSILOR purchasing Signet Armorlite is now official
    By Chris Ryser in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 02:11 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 11:55 PM
  4. Signet Armorlite
    By ODC1 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-19-2006, 11:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •