Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Rotational Image shift, Monocular

  1. #1
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mamaroneck, NY
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    4

    Rotational Image shift, Monocular

    Has anyone dealt with a patient complaining of looking at a clock face and seeing the 12 and 6 o'clock markers rotated (torqued) to the left when viewing in one eye(OS) only? Binocular vision is clear and single.

    Pt has had retinal surgery with scleral buckles in both eyes.

    OD -7.50 -2.00 x 005 2 Prism Base Down 20/25+
    OS -7.50 -2.00 x 180 2 Prism Base Up 20/25+

    Is this Anisokonia secondary to the scleral buckle? (there was no need for prism before the scleral buckle about 12 years ago)

    Any suggestions?

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Just to clarify, pt had the scleral buckles put in 12 years ago? What was the pathology, retinal detachment OU? is there any other pathologies? Are the pts pupils similar in size?

  3. #3
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mamaroneck, NY
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    4

    Pathology?

    Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick777 View Post
    Just to clarify, pt had the scleral buckles put in 12 years ago? What was the pathology, retinal detachment OU? is there any other pathologies? Are the pts pupils similar in size?
    Pathology was retinal detachments OU. Pupils are Equal, Round, Reactive to Light. they dilate well.

  4. #4
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    I would suspect a macular pucker given equal pupil sizes. Was there a large RX change from previous RX? Is this a new patient or one that you have seen before? I have seen a new (and better) spectacle RX reveal flaws that were previously there but masked by poor VA. Its possible that the patient had the waves before and just did not have the acuity to notice them.

    Either way, an OCT would be helpful.

    Note: since you are new to the board, I am not an OD, but I am an Optician with 11 years experience in managing clinics in both Optometry and Opthalmology and being the person the Drs came to when they had something baffling. I am not qualified to diagnose, but have over many years solved some optical problems that defied convention.

  5. #5
    OptiBoard Professional Ory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    977
    How long has the rotational shift been around - is it dating back to the buckle?

    I wonder if the patient had some retinal translocation when it was stuck back down. Translocation was (is?) an experimental Sx for AMD where they would deliberately detach the retina to move the macula to a better perfused area. One surgeon I spoke to who was doing the surgery said that often patients had some kind of rotational complaint because the retina was rotated.

  6. #6
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Oh by the way, Welcome to Optiboard SoundShoreVision! There are some amazing people here... and I count many among them as friends.

  7. #7
    OptiWizard
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NY
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    389
    Two tests I would do would be amsler grid to determine metamorphopsia, if any. Second, topography to rule out corneal involvement.

    I would nix the macular translocation theory due to the 20/25 acuity. Check your cyl power and axis as well...

  8. #8
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mamaroneck, NY
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    4
    The acuity has been quite good throughout the years. He has been coming to see me for about 18 years. He has complained of similar problems in years past, but since the problem is only monocular, it has not needed to be addressed. He has just gotten a new pair of glasses this month. So I am trying to address this issue at this time.

    There has been no translocation, and surgical procedures for many years. I think it is torsion from the scleral buckle, but I am interested in other eye care professional's thoughts.

    I try not to discriminate between the three O's. I will accept any answer that makes sense!

    Thank you for helping me to help my patient.

  9. #9
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    QUOTE=OHPNTZ;361932] Second, topography to rule out corneal involvement./QUOTE]

    I LOVE topography for eliminating issues, but on the West Coast most insurance carriers will deny a claim for topography used for screening. Expect the patient to pay out of pocket.

  10. #10
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mamaroneck, NY
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick777 View Post
    QUOTE=OHPNTZ;361932] Second, topography to rule out corneal involvement./QUOTE]

    I LOVE topography for eliminating issues, but on the West Coast most insurance carriers will deny a claim for topography used for screening. Expect the patient to pay out of pocket.

    Worth a shot to see if the cornea is distorted.

    Thanks.

  11. #11
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Quote Originally Posted by SoundShoreVision View Post
    Worth a shot to see if the cornea is distorted.
    Thanks.
    It is, especially on those tough 20/25 patients. I still think irregular astigmatism is responsible for far more problems that end up getting blamed on the eyewear than we realize, but that is another subject.

  12. #12
    Master OptiBoarder cleyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Yonkers, NY
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    768
    Try putting RGP on the eye and do sphero-cyl over-refraction. If image persists then retinal "wrinkle" due to buckle. IMHO


    Welcome neighbour from one newbie to another, you'll like it here!! :bbg:
    Last edited by cleyes; 09-28-2010 at 09:01 PM. Reason: Lapse in manners
    WE SEE THINGS NOT AS THEY ARE, BUT AS WE ARE..... Anais Nin

  13. #13
    Master OptiBoarder cleyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Yonkers, NY
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    768
    Outcome??
    WE SEE THINGS NOT AS THEY ARE, BUT AS WE ARE..... Anais Nin

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Use of Monocular Seg Measurements
    By s-man-optiker in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 04:16 PM
  2. PALs for Monocular
    By tktien in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-11-2007, 09:18 PM
  3. Monocular decentration?
    By Michael Walach in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-19-2004, 08:45 PM
  4. Monocular Balancing
    By Deepak in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-26-2003, 08:28 PM
  5. monocular PD and PALs
    By ashish in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-02-2002, 07:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •