I am a bit confused, in the Oblique Cylinder Chart where 0,180 is 0% power and 90 is 100% power is this the plus version of the chart or the minus?
I am a bit confused, in the Oblique Cylinder Chart where 0,180 is 0% power and 90 is 100% power is this the plus version of the chart or the minus?
The percentage is a ratio so it can apply to eitehr plus or minus cyl for instance:
90 is 100% in your chart
-1.00 -1.50 x 005
To find the power at the 095 since the axis is 90 degrees away (95-5=90) then the power would be the sphere power * 100% of the cylinder
-1.00 + (1.00) * (-1.50) = -2.50
The same would hold true if the cylinder were +:
-1.00 +1.50 x 005
To find the power at the 095 since the axis is 90 degrees away (95-5=90) then the power would be the sphere power * 100% of the cylinder
-1.00 + (1.00) * (+1.50) = +0.50
Thanks YrahG for your reply. What I guess I am not understanding is why do I have 2 different charts one says 0,180 is 100% of the power the other one says 0,180 is 0% of the power?
The 0/180 = 100% is wrong or you should just get rid of it now. Your chart should look something like this:
0/180 = 0%
15 = 7%
30 = 25%
45 = 50%
60 = 75%
75 = 93%
90 = 100%
If you were to graph the results it would look like a sin wave, you will see some books use a linear progression and for most purposes it works, but loses accuracy towards the extremes.
I was one of those people that was confused by the graph initially, because it didn't follow a simple logical pattern (i.e.: 180= 0%, 90=100%, 45=50%, so logically say at 22.5 degrees away, you should see 25% of cylinder, which is not the case) The formula used to find the applied cylinder power is as follows: F = Fcyl*(SIN(Î))^2 where Fcyl is the cylinder power and Î is the angle between the cylinder axis and the new meridian (aka, the meridian you are testing). For testing and quick-reference, I would suggest memorizing the major ones, as stated above. But if you want a more accurate solution for any instance outside of those 5 axis, you should know this formula. In my opinion, it's just silly to try to memorize a huge chart.
Here is a graphical version of a linear and actual chart.
Last edited by YrahG; 05-05-2010 at 09:53 AM.
I had no problem memorizing the chart there is a trick 012456788988765421 though the formula is definitely more practical. Wish it had been in my study material before I memorized the chart I would have saved the time.
Does anyone know for the ABO exam if they provide calculators or scratch paper? I know they do not allow testers to bring them in with them.
Last edited by Strab; 05-05-2010 at 10:17 AM.
Sorry, no calculators... bummer. But rest assured that any of the math you need to do is easy enough to do on scrap paper (which they allow, if I'm remembering correctly).
Update: Now I'm second guessing myself about the calculator. I know I didn't use one... so even if they do allow it, it's pretty simple math.
Last edited by musicvirtuoso; 05-05-2010 at 11:08 AM.
Thanks musicvirtuoso! I have heard so many people say how hard the test was. Then others say it is way to easy. I just hope I am prepared well enough because I do not want to have to retake it. I am hoping to start studying for my next certification right away. Things I should have done years ago but life happens.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks