Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Checking with Rotlex

  1. #1
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    london
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    341

    Checking with Rotlex

    I sent back a progressive as I couldn't get a good reading in the reading portion
    As a supplier of progressive lenses I assumed they would check them using a Rotlex however they haven't one
    My question is do you think it is required for a supplier to have one?
    Thanks!
    Alan

    PS it isn't a supplier of all varifocals just their own brand

  2. #2
    Underemployed Genius Jacqui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Frostbite Falls, Mn.
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    7,417
    I hope Harry Chilling gets in on this one. Please !!!!!

    I agree it would be nice, unfortunately it isn't going to happen. It is possible to get a close reading without one using a digital lensometer, but you need to be real sneaky. Most surfacing programs do calculate a set of corrections at the PRP that can be read using the auto lensometer.

  3. #3
    Allen Weatherby
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    1,286

    Lens mapping software

    Quote Originally Posted by apaul View Post
    I sent back a progressive as I couldn't get a good reading in the reading portion
    As a supplier of progressive lenses I assumed they would check them using a Rotlex however they haven't one
    My question is do you think it is required for a supplier to have one?
    Thanks!
    Alan

    PS it isn't a supplier of all varifocals just their own brand
    Lens mapping software can be helpful in number of ways. Just because someone has such equipment will not assure you they know how to verify with it. With any digitally cut freeform lens the possiblity for error does exist. However manufacturing mistakes with any lenes can happen at any stage for a number of reasons. Lens mapping equipment is just one helpful component.

    (We do have such equipment and it does help confirm that a problem exists)

  4. #4
    ATO Member HarryChiling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Nowhereville
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    7,765
    ...............
    Last edited by HarryChiling; 10-12-2009 at 09:04 PM. Reason: Thanks Uncle Fester ; )
    1st* HTML5 Tracer Software
    1st Mac Compatible Tracer Software
    1st Linux Compatible Tracer Software

    *Dave at OptiVision has a web based tracer integration package that's awesome.

  5. #5
    Compulsive Truthteller OptiBoard Gold Supporter Uncle Fester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    At a position without dimension...
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,309

    It was late...

    Quote Originally Posted by HarryChiling View Post
    If they don't use any sort of mapping system it would be the equivalent of you selling glasses without a lensometer in shop.
    You mean without don't you?

  6. #6
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Back in NYC.....Shenzhen, China and Hong Kong
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    1,155
    Quote Originally Posted by HarryChiling View Post
    The sotware that comes with the Rotlex allows input of the intended design and then a snapshot of the lens post processing and will give the operator a difference map that shows the differences between the intended and the actual. It is not very difficult to read, it shows a scale ont he side fo the maps with the powers color coded. If they don't use any sort of mapping system it would be the equivalent of you selling glasses without a lensometer in shop.
    From my understanding the power map cannot be converted to a point files. With a point file you could theoretically go back and re-tool the lens. What export files are available for the Rotlex and what information do they provide in the export file?

  7. #7
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Beer-Sheva, Israel
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    59

    The right way of doing this

    As back progressive FF lenses have curvatures which do not enable measuring the way lensometers are supposed to work, an alternative method should be used.
    A right way of doing this would be as follows:
    1) Trust the theoretical lens design.
    2) Use the point file (topography) to generate an optical power map, within the optical configuration of your specific lens mapper.
    3) Map the lens
    4) Subtract the measured map from the theoretical one, and compare the differences to your tolerances.

    Attached is a screen-shot summarizing this chain of operations, as my customers do.

    As for item #1, one should use a reputable manufacturer, as there's a limit to what one can do....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails FFV full screen.jpg  

  8. #8
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Down in a hole!
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    13,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Raanan Bavli View Post
    As back progressive FF lenses have curvatures which do not enable measuring the way lensometers are supposed to work, an alternative method should be used.
    A right way of doing this would be as follows:
    [COLOR=black]1) Trust the theoretical lens design.do....[/SIZE][/LEFT]

    Ah.........ok?

    Why?

  9. #9
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Beer-Sheva, Israel
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    59

    Are you asking why practitioners should trust the design?

    If so, my opinion is that the design software has probably been made by top professionals and has been thoroughly debugged. Moreover, this software is tested tens of thousands of time per day by patients receiving their prescribed lenses. There's some percentage of unhappy patients but this most likely originates from other reasons (errors in prescribing, manufacturing, dispensing....). The FF production method is the weakest point in the chain. It's a great way of making lenses, but assuming that once properly setting the generator, one can make an infinite number of good lenses, is unprofessional conduct.

  10. #10
    registeredoptician Refractingoptician.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    North America
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    1,323
    I thought I had one of these Rotlex units in storage in the back room . Darn , I have to get new glasses ... when I opened the box , it turned out to be old frame invoices and statements , someone had marked the box "Rotlux" .

    How much do these things cost ?

  11. #11
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Beer-Sheva, Israel
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    59

    Class Plus

    Quote Originally Posted by Refractingoptician.com View Post
    How much do these things cost ?
    Tens of thousands of $. Beyond the reach of optometrists, and probably beyond their needs....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. checking references
    By scograd in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 10:51 PM
  2. Checking PALs
    By Clive Noble in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-22-2005, 04:36 PM
  3. Optom, checking on you.
    By Diane in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-30-2004, 04:04 PM
  4. just checking
    By Steve Machol in forum Test Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-17-2001, 05:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •