View Poll Results: Should Opticians Refract

Voters
350. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes (unequivocally, with no supervision or restrictions)- with formal training

    132 37.71%
  • Yes (with no supervision, but with restrictions as to whom can be seen)

    69 19.71%
  • Yes (with supervision)

    68 19.43%
  • No (because there is no need for Opticians to refract)

    67 19.14%
  • No (Opticians are not capable of refracting)

    14 4.00%
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2789101112
Results 276 to 287 of 287

Thread: Should Opticians Refract - The Poll

  1. #276
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    California
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    169
    I would say that if Opticians want to refract they should have to do some schooling for it. If optometry school is four years, part of it is understanding the science behind refracting. I'm sure most opticians would not enjoy taking a calculus based physics. I personally found my physics class like that very helpful. I think certain on the job training is useful, but that can only go so far. Almost all my engineers friends understand all the optics because they have the schooling and almost all my coworkers don't. Now if there was only a way to convince my friends to take a pay cut, I think I could make them good opticians.

  2. #277
    Master OptiBoarder rbaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Gold Hill, OR
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    4,389
    If you want to learn refraction on you own, in the dark of night, I suggest that you get a copy of:

    Refraction, A Programmed Text by Robert D. Reinecke, MD and Robert J. Herm, MD

    They also have a Programmed Text on Strabismus.

    Good stuff. Highly recommended.
    Last edited by rbaker; 09-25-2020 at 10:44 PM.

  3. #278
    Eyes eastward... Uilleann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    2,909
    Quote Originally Posted by bta89 View Post
    I would say that if Opticians want to refract they should have to do some schooling for it. If optometry school is four years, part of it is understanding the science behind refracting. I'm sure most opticians would not enjoy taking a calculus based physics. I personally found my physics class like that very helpful. I think certain on the job training is useful, but that can only go so far...
    Funny thing is, this is precisely the way many (perhaps even most) COAs and COTs learn refraction. It's on the job. Minimal training. Sure the MD comes in to "check" things, but rarely makes changes in my experience. Refractions aren't billable medical codes of course, so they just don't put much stock in them at all broadly speaking. Many opticians see that and will question the need/utility of formal education in that regard.

    It [quality education] obviously makes sense of course, but playing the devil's advocate here, I think that genie is already out of the bottle.

  4. #279
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In Flux
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,605
    First you need to define “optician”. Many in my mind would not qualify for that title, never mind refracting.

  5. #280
    OptiBoard Professional Excel-Lentes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Hartford, CT
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by idispense View Post
    First you need to define “optician”. Many in my mind would not qualify for that title, never mind refracting.
    Good point, unfortunately

  6. #281
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Central Texas
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1
    My position is No, because there's no need for Opticians to refract. Where do we leave those newly minted and tenured Optometrists? In this industry (being as it is) ODs don't get much respect from Ophthalmologists.

  7. #282
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC, USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,902
    And give Opticians little either. That is understandable. High school educations, primarily, and little real technical knowledge. ODs took the right path. Opticians stood nd watch and that continues. Both of these last couple of poster........I wonder i you have ever seen the rudimentary refractions. CHeck out You Tube and your mind may change. Refraction is not rocket science. I've trained hundreds since 1979 all workin in neat places and able to contribute far more than a simple PD or seg height.

  8. #283
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC, USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,902
    Keep on with your PD and Sag Height measurements. Consider CL fitting.

  9. #284
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter Barry Santini's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Seaford, NY USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,871
    The “problem” is that it doesn't take passing through a formal cirriculum to make eyewear buyers reach 20/Happy.

    The real metric, IMHO, would be to remove VCPs as the primary driver for patronage and create a metric around repeat business and a survey as to why they choose to repeat at an optical establishment.

    B

  10. #285
    OptiBoard Professional KrystleClear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    104
    Our MD has the technicians refract during the workup and he finalizes is. At some point, I feel like the techs end up doing a large part of what an optometrist does, but without the pay rate. I don't think I personally would want to do refractions. I can't stand when people can't give a straight answer - better one or two? Well one looks brighter, but two may be a little crisper? Well, then again...." etc. etc..
    Krystle

  11. #286
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    usa
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by KrystleClear View Post
    Our MD has the technicians refract during the workup and he finalizes is. At some point, I feel like the techs end up doing a large part of what an optometrist does, but without the pay rate. I don't think I personally would want to do refractions. I can't stand when people can't give a straight answer - better one or two? Well one looks brighter, but two may be a little crisper? Well, then again...." etc. etc..
    I think you have made a gross underestimation of what an optometrist does, and an equally massive overvaluation of a tech.

    Even speaking strictly about the refraction, between a tech/OMD and and OD, I will take the OD's refraction 10 out of 10 times. I won't even fill Rx's from most MD clinics near me anymore without auto-refracting and trial framing.

  12. #287
    OptiBoard Professional KrystleClear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by Kwill212 View Post
    I think you have made a gross underestimation of what an optometrist does, and an equally massive overvaluation of a tech.

    Even speaking strictly about the refraction, between a tech/OMD and and OD, I will take the OD's refraction 10 out of 10 times. I won't even fill Rx's from most MD clinics near me anymore without auto-refracting and trial framing.
    I am just speaking from my experience. I came from an office where the techs just worked the patient up and prepped them for the doc, but were not involved in refracting, diagnosing, or educating patients on their new diagnoses. Working with an OMD, techs do the workup, instill drops, administer testing and interpret, prep the charts with the diagnoses they think are appropriate and hand off to the OMD, who then takes a look with the slit lamp and goes over the notes from the tech and has the final say on the diagnoses. He has them look through the phoropter with the tech's MR and finalizes. I imagine it is pretty similar with most OMDs. I have known some that don't even put the MR in the phoropter to check if the patient is actually seeing well.

    Our techs don't remove foreign bodies or put in punctal plugs, or any of the many other things that optometrists do. I did not mean to say that refracting is all the do. Our optometrist does a lot. I just meant that in my opinion, the refraction is the doctor's job. Just my opinion though. Our optometrist is excellent. He is extremely thorough. He works most days with no assistance from the techs, as they are all tied up with the OMD's patients. He is the most thorough doctor I have worked with, honestly. Some optoms just roll with the autorefractor and don't even dilate patients unless they're kids or diabetic - I have worked with many who finish the exam in five minutes or less. I worked with one in particular who only ever wrote the RX as per what the autorefractor said. We ended up with A LOT of remakes after rx checks.
    Krystle

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Tennessee Licensing Sunset
    By Roy R. Ferguson in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-18-2005, 10:10 PM
  2. OAA National Opticians Convention to be held at
    By Newsroom in forum Optical Industry News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-01-2003, 01:09 PM
  3. Letter from the Puerto Rico Academy of Opticians
    By Mark Miller- POF in forum Professional and Educational Organizations Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-17-2002, 12:47 AM
  4. Q: How do I post a poll?
    By Maria in forum Q&A
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-30-2001, 01:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •