I just had my eyes examed and a refraction test done. The refraction test was done with a electronic instrument in which they still say "which is better 1 or 2". In the past this was done by the doctor with lenses. I guess I thought the electronic way was just to ball park and the lenses way was more exact.
Is this electronic way the new way or should they have done both?
The also took a photograph of my eye and charge me over my copay stating it is not covered by insurance. Is this reccommended?
Also, he wants to see me every year but my insurance only pays for every two years. I have no major items or concerns that should be monitored just poor eyesight. I just blow him off and go every two years. Should I go every year?
Bookmarks