Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Student invents low cost lenses........................

  1. #1
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Blue Jumper Student invents low cost lenses........................

    Press Release

    MIT STUDENT INVENTOR SEES CLEAR FUTURE IN ëDESKTOP PRINTERí FOR LOW-COST EYEGLASS LENSES
    Saul Griffith Awarded $30,000 Lemelson-MIT
    Student Prize for Inventiveness



    CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (February 19, 2004)—Massachusetts Institute of Technology doctoral candidate Saul Griffith, whose inventions include a ìdesktop printerî for low-cost eyeglass lenses, received the prestigious $30,000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize for inventiveness during a ceremony this morning at MIT.

    Merton Flemings, director of the Lemelson-MIT Program, which sponsors the annual award, cited Griffithís innovative device for manufacturing low-cost eyeglass lenses and his work creating comic strips that inspired children to learn about science and engineering as important reasons he was chosen this year.

    ìSaul tackles some very challenging real-world problems, yet at the same time there is a wonderful sense of playfulness and simplicity to his work,î Flemings said. ìHis low-cost vision-testing and lens-manufacturing inventions could dramatically improve life for billions of people in developing countries who cannot access, nor afford, prescription glasses.î

    ìItís sometimes easier for engineers and scientists to work on the next generation of computer chips or the next PDA, but there are some beautiful problems that a lot of people donít go after because itís hard to get support and funding and itís incredibly hard to be successful,î Griffith said. ìIt would be nice if my work inspired others to address some of these problems and make them more acceptable.î



    Low-Cost Eyewear
    Griffith’s advances in low-cost lenses sprung from his interests in rapid prototyping technologies and efficient manufacturing. Using a process dubbed programmable molding, he created a portable device similar to a desktop printer that can produce any prescription lens from a single-mold surface in five to 10 minutes.

    The device casts the lenses by applying pressure and constraints to a programmable membrane, which becomes the mold surface when under pressure. The current device uses car window tinting film for the membrane and a reservoir of baby oil for applying the correct pressure. A large range of lens types, covering the majority of prescriptions, can be cast from two such mold surfaces.

    Traditional lens manufacturing systems require expensive molds for each lens type. In remote rural areas, it is cost-prohibitive to maintain a library of thousands of lenses for relatively small populations of people. The traditional process not only comes with enormous inventory and handling costs, but also can result in excessive waste. Griffithís patent-pending device essentially eliminates these problems.

    But efficient lens manufacturing is only half the issue. Proper diagnosis of vision problems is the other half. Current automatic diagnostic technologies are expensive, fragile and error-prone. Because they rely on a patient looking at electronically generated images a few inches away from his or her face, they can lead to incorrect diagnoses. Plus, highly skilled people are required to operate these machines.

    To resolve this problem, Griffith has created a prototype device to test the human eye. Patients need only wear the device, which looks like an oversized pair of goggles, and look at the world around them. An electronic sensor superimposed on the goggles monitors the lens in the wearerís eye and adjusts the deviceís lens to cancel the refractive errors, thus determining the correct prescription.

    In 2001, Griffith and colleague Neil Houghton won the Harvard Business School Social Enterprise Business Plan Contest for the concept. They have since started a company called Low Cost Eyeglasses (www.lowcosteyeglasses.net) to manufacture and market the product.



    Invention Is Fun-damental
    Griffith attributes his inventiveness to his nurturing parents, an artist and an engineer who reside in his native Sydney, Australia. ìI was always tinkering with things I found laying around, just to get ideas,î he recalled. ìWhen youíre a kid you donít really think about it, but you learn a lot about how stuff works. Now, I can subconsciously draw upon all of the things I broke growing up. Fortunately, my parents encouraged my toy de-construction!î

    Through a project called Howtoons (www.howtoons.org), Griffith and collaborators Joost Bonsen and Nick Dragotta, seek to instill that same mischievous spirit of discovery in future generations of kids. Part comic strip and part science experiment, the one-page Howtoons help children find imaginative new uses for soda bottles, plastic buckets, duct tape, balloons, ice, salt and other household materials. Griffith said the project aims to inspire kids to see the world not for what it is, but for what it could be.

    Tools of Mass Construction
    Much of Griffithís research is in industrial materials science and manufacturing. ìIím influenced by the elegant way nature manufactures things, which is significantly better, in most cases, than the way humans do. I hope to develop new manufacturing processes that are simpler and can make things more efficiently and with less waste. You can characterize my work as ëtools of mass construction,íî he said.

    Griffithís doctoral thesis at the MIT Media Laboratory explores the relationship between information and physical structure in materials and self-assembly. He is looking at ways to build programmatically assembling machines and materials with higher complexity and function than current self-assembling systems. His research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation Center for Bits and Atoms and DARPA.

    About the $30,000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize
    The $30,000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize is awarded annually to an MIT senior or graduate student who has created or improved a product or process, applied a technology in a new way, redesigned a system, or in other ways has demonstrated remarkable inventiveness. A distinguished panel of scientists, technologists, engineers and entrepreneurs selects the winner. This is the 10th year the Lemelson-MIT Program has given the award.

    About the Lemelson-MIT Program
    The Lemelson-MIT Program aims to raise the stature of inventors and provide resources and inspiration to make invention and innovation more accessible to todayís youth. It accomplishes this mission through outreach activities and annual awards, including the worldís largest prize for invention ‚ the $500,000 Lemelson-MIT Prize.

    The Lemelson-MIT Program was founded in 1994 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology by Jerome H. Lemelson, one of the worldís most prolific inventors, and his wife, Dorothy. It is funded by The Lemelson Foundation, a private philanthropy committed to honoring the contributions of inventors, innovators and entrepreneurs, and to inspiring ingenuity in others. More information on the Lemelson-MIT Program is online at http://web.mit.edu/invent.

  2. #2
    Cape Codger OptiBoard Gold Supporter hcjilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cape Cod, Hyannis, MA. USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    7,437
    Chris, didn't you post this 2 years ago when it was new? I know someone did.- h
    "Always laugh when you can. It is a cheap medicine"
    Lord Byron

    Take a photo tour of Cape Cod and the Islands!
    www.capecodphotoalbum.com

  3. #3
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,419
    Science fiction. And baloney.

  4. #4
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Redhot Jumper Getting bad......................

    Quote Originally Posted by hcjilson
    Chris, didn't you post this 2 years ago when it was new? I know someone did.- h
    Harry.....thanks and maybe I did..................getting bad, wonder if Alzheimer sets in. (I missed on the date of the press release). Or maybe its the warm weather, 87F, that slows down the brain waves. :bbg: :hammer:

  5. #5
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,419
    website copyright 2001-2004. Revolutionized the world, I'll tell you. Cold fusion for the optical industry.

  6. #6
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    USA
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    233
    I have had some discussions with Saul's partner Neil Houghton. Unfortunately their efforts have not yet become meaningful. Earlier efforts by Jim and Bob Morrison also failed to become a viable business.

    The approach taken by both efforts were logical and inventive. There were not "science fiction and baloney".

    There are over 2 billion people worldwide who need eyewear but are unable to afford the purchase. Humanitarian efforts are important but are unlikely to satisfy a meaningful portion of the unfulfilled need. The lack of vision correction devices has a giant affect on the lives of these 2 billion. Business efforts to satisfy the need deserve our admiration and not our sarcasm.

  7. #7
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,419
    Sorry to step on toes, Impact...BUT

    Click on link, read it and laugh, then press "existing system is stuck" button for more baloney.

    I hate these kinds of pukes that think they are going to solve the world's problems with their little inventions. Calculating economic costs of uncorrected refractive error: RIGHT. A+ Mr. Harvard M.B.A wise-acre. And the developed world is causing it, but is riding to the rescue...

    There are at least a hundred problems with this kind of thinking.

    Due to a short supply in various countries, optometrists are able to sustain a substantial markup on materials (or whatever). Yeah, we O.D.'s in the world have been living LARGE off the backs of the little people.

    That kind of BULL**** is what we get out of our higher institutions, these days.

    No, the kid geniuses can't just invent a better lens, they have to "feed...the...world..." with it. And down with "the man", while we're at it.

    I'm suprised, Impact, that you can't see through this garbage.

  8. #8
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    USA
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    233
    drk: <<I'm suprised, Impact, that you can't see through this garbage.>>

    I guess I'm just an idiot.

  9. #9
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,419
    No, you're obviously not.

    Tell me though, what you think of their analysis of the economic situation.

  10. #10
    Master OptiBoarder chm2023's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Camp Hill/NYC
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by impact500
    drk: <<I'm suprised, Impact, that you can't see through this garbage.>>

    I guess I'm just an idiot.
    Or perhaps you have an open mind......:cheers:

  11. #11
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,419
    Ahhh, CHM!

    Now this thread is getting interesting...

  12. #12
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter Jubilee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    United States
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,197
    I didn't interpet the article as one stating that doctors are "screwing" with the poor. The article did mention the costs involved in trying to carry a large inventory of lenses to service a small population, which are indeed a factor in the economic equation. Reading the link.. yes at times it was a bit self righteous, but I didn't find it offensive. What they define as the problem is the way the system is amd is intended. Us Americans want our Customized choices!

    Many of these countries have very limited health resources in general. The local clinic when we were in Tocapilla Chile had only heperin to give when our director suffered a heart attack. The govenor of the state actually had him air lifted as soon as he was stable to his personal physician to make sure he could receive adequate care. We were lucky there was a clinic anywhere on that side of the mountains. As far as eyecare was concerned.. it was only available in the 3-4 cities in all of Chile. So not only do you have to save up several months worth of pay for the glasses, but then pay travel expenses to obtain the care and to wait for the eyewear.

    I think it is laudable that these men were trying to come up with a solution. While there are a number of errors that can come about by using a autorefractor type device, and using casting type lenses.. you can't tell me that the current methods used to try to give vision to these people are better. Currently mission efforts are based upon autorefractors with some basic testing from docs, and choosing from a collection of used glasses for the closest match. In some cases such as those geared toward children and areas in the North American Continent, a small edging lab can be set up but inventory of lenses are still an issue, and there will be a lot of people with compromised acuities.

    It is a shame when some mom rejoices over receiving a 10 year old pair of glasses, that has some light scratching on them in that good ole double bar aviator frame, in a script that is only 2/3 of what she needs. Yet that script enables her to be able to see and read to her child, which is something she hasn't been able to do before then.

    I had the pleasure of helping a man in Chile who was in an accident and his glasses broke. He had been unable to work for several months because he couldn't see to drive. By not being able to work, he couldn't provide for his family. And by family we aren't talking about wife and kids, we are talking their parents as well. You can't tell me that getting his -10 glasses with some cyl didn't improve his economic situation.

    Serving on these mission teams, and really experiencing what it is like for them really opens the eyes, and the soul.

    Cassandra
    "Some believe in destiny, and some believe in fate. But I believe that happiness is something we create."-Something More by Sugarland

  13. #13
    Ophthalmic Optician
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    USSA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    12,591
    Hey it's about time we sent some cheap lenses to third world countries...


    ...that way, the corrupt governments (and/or warlords) that end up with all the "we are the world" freebies, will be able to read the packages and know where the gifts are coming from.

  14. #14
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    new york
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    3,749
    Nothing will solve all the ills of the world. Don't you think these inventors are just trying to make themselves rich? In any case, if you want to help out the visual welfare of the world, go to http://vosh.org
    You'll have the experience of a lifetime...and you can do it today, and not wait for someone's invention to become financially viable.

  15. #15
    What's up? drk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    9,419
    If you read with your eyes open, you will see the political bias. I'll start it off:


    "The surprisingly low penetration of glasses on a global basis is a result of the fundamental structure of the eye care industry. The current commercial eye care system is designed for the wealthy, first world customer, and espouses its customers' values. The system is characterized by extreme product diversity, customized product combinations, highly trained specialists, and a fashion focused product design and buying processes. As a result, prescription glasses are unaffordable by the majority of people in the world, and access is severely limited."

    That's a load of doo-doo.
    Firstly, the current commercial eye care system was not "designed". It evolved to suit the needs of the marketplace. Doh!

    "Espouses it's customers' values". Yeah, I'd think that is a little axiomatic, don't you?

    "As a result..." No! The fact that glasses are "unaffordable" to the "majority of people in the world" is not a result of the "fundamental structure of the eye care industry"! They're unaffordable because the people are "poor"! Get it straight.

    Secondly, there are already cheap, cheap, cheap alternatives today. You can buy a frame from China for $1 USD. You can get SV lenses for $3.

    "By focusing on the group of customers that have been excluded from the eyecare industry..."

    Anyone here excluded anyone, today? I haven't.

    "The majority of the people who need them have the means and desire to buy them if they were available to them at a reasonable cost."

    In fact, the market determines what's "reasonable".

    "Micro-entrepreneurs are also more likely to charge for their service a price that is more consistent with the local incomes of the people they are trying to serve."

    Duh. Anyone in business that prices their service higher than the market will bear will fail, and anyone who prices at market levels will succeed. That's some astute thinkin' there.

    The Problem: Existing System Is Stuck

    The existing commercial sytem has failed to serve the 1 billion people in need of vision correction for two reasons:

    Again, as part of the "commercial" eye care industry, I have failed no one.

    There is truth to this statement, though. A commercial system will benefit those who have means. We have a commercial system, ergo those without means don't have glasses. This is a ridiculously simple refutation of this whole goofy website. If the "developing" world wants to take advantage of the free enterprise system, then they have to develop their economies and their form of government, if possible. I really don't think the "eye care system" as it stands today has let anyone down.

    Unlike industries that adapt to meet opportunities, the eyeglass industry is structurally incapable of self-correction to meet the needs of the developing world because:


    1.The industry is fundamentally based on a developed world value system, and 2.The industry is caught in an "unvirtuous" cycle of reinforcing products and demand focused on the developed world
    Here we go again. What exactly is a developed world value system? How does this DWVS differ from the non-DWVS? Can you point to a non-DWVS that somehow would have avoided this problem? Hmm, let's think about that for awhile...command economy...cradle-to-grave government health care...I just can't put my finger on what that reminds me of...


    UNVIRTUOUS CYCLE? Do I even need to address this broadside? Click the link! Click the link!

    I'm tired of this crap. If they think they can provide low-cost lenses to the marketplace that outcompetes current products, then good for them. They don't seem able to, of course. If they can come up with a product that they can market to third-world countries, good for them. Let them try to sell it to the "poor people" and make a profit of their choice, and provide a service (like all people in the economy do) where there is a need (market).

    However, the grandiose disparagement of the existing world free-market enterprise system, in general, the implied "unvirtuousness" of the developed world, and, specifically, the attack on the eye care industry is completely sophomoric and uncalled for.

    This is the kind of liberal junk that needs exposed.
    Last edited by drk; 03-21-2006 at 11:45 AM.

  16. #16
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Big Smile Chris, didn't you post this 2 years ago .............

    Quote Originally Posted by hcjilson
    Chris, didn't you post this 2 years ago when it was new? I know someone did.- h
    After all I did not know that this old post would create a new wave of hot discussions.

    It's like re-packing an older lens model and sell it as the latest novelty.

    :bbg:

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Contact Lenses?
    By ioconnell in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-26-2007, 08:43 AM
  2. Transitions/Polarising
    By Lewy in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-24-2005, 09:33 AM
  3. Are high-index aspheric 1.67 lenses worth the extra money?
    By dave191 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-16-2005, 10:54 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •