Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Alcon rejects claims...........

  1. #1
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Alcon rejects claims...........

    Nestle eyecare unit Alcon rejects claims of faulty machines Sunday, August 29 16:37:33AFX ZURICH (AFX) - Nestle AG's majority owned eyecare unit Alcon Inc said that allegations regarding faults with its LADARVision 4000 laser eye surgery machine are "false and inaccurate".

    Alcon's statement was in response to an article in the Saturday edition of UK daily The Times about two lawsuits filed in the US claiming that some of these machines are faulty, leading to damage to eyesight.

    "This article is based on the invalid contentions of parties who are attempting to avoid multi-million dollar debt owed to Alcon by raising claims that are completely unsupported by scientific or legitimate evidence," the company said. "The LADARVision system is safe and effective."

    The Times said it has seen leaked data which "appear to support the contention that some machines operated erratically between 2000 and 2002. It suggests that in 2002 more than a third of patients had to be re-treated at more than a dozen surgeries."

    The paper also said it has had information from more than 20 doctors in Canada and the US who say that they have had problems with LADARVision devices.

    The article also said a machine used in a Boots Group PLC London eye surgery clinic was one of a problem batch of lasers identified by Alcon in 2001 and was subject to a US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) enforcement report.

    The problem was modified on site in 2001, the paper said.

    Alcon rejected the allegations in a statement issued on Saturday.

    Claims made in the article regarding retreatment rates with LADARVision are "false", it said.

    "They are based on a fundamental mischaracterization and incorrect analysis of an internal Alcon financial document that have lead to the article's invalid conclusion. The document referenced does not provide information that can be used to accurately calculate retreatment rates," it said.

    Moreover, "field action" taken on machines in 2001 was in order to "prevent a potential malfunction, and ensure the continued safety of the laser," Alcon said.

    Alcon notified the FDA of this field action and the FDA reviewed the field action and deemed it closed, Alcon said.

    scs/ak

    For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and www.afxpress.com


  2. #2
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    -
    Posts
    7

    ALCON Accused of Criminal Conduct in Concealing Reports of Defective Lasers


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-13-2003, 03:32 PM
  2. Transitions Lens Claims
    By varmint in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-25-2003, 07:53 PM
  3. Alcon Express MPS and No Rub MPS have same ingredients but different prices
    By dyip in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 04:57 AM
  4. If you have ever been taken to small claims court...
    By Cindy Hamlin in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-16-2003, 10:18 PM
  5. Group Claims First Cloned Human Born
    By Steve Machol in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-30-2002, 02:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •