Search:

I have a Zeiss Gradal Tops in 1.67 with -10.25 and -10.0, with an add of 1.0D. The lens has 18mm height. Very light astigmatism in the right eye.

Is it possible, assuming proper grinding of the...

Al,

Can you tell me why you like a single vision over a pal such as the Zeiss RD?

Sus,

Thanks for the advice and the witty puns!

Cameron

Karen,

No, it's one question, regrettably, inarticulately posed.

Add is 1.0D and this is a first time pal wearer (me), but a long time myopic, -10.25 and -10.0. No astigmatism to worry about.
...

Thanks Darris!

Since .5 to 1.0 D is a "boo boo" (I love the term!), what does the guy--whose fault this all is--mean when he says the add power would have to be +2.5 D for me to be able to see...

This should be fun.

What opinions do you have on the various pals?

I'm interested in knowing what experts consider to be (and of course why) the best lens for a very high minus (-10.25)....

Darrel,

Thanks for your reply, and allow me to apologize for taking so long to thank you.

The head Optometrist now thinks, as you suggest, that there is too much add in the distance portion of...

Does anyone have any comments on the new Zeiss Lantal 1.9 for use in the Gradal Top pal?

Thanks in advance!

Cameron Reddy
creddy@cameronreddy.com

Al,

Thanks for the reply. My optometrist now agrees with me that I'm looking through the intermediate corridor to attain my best distance acuity.

At first, as you guessed, she did think that I...

Can anyone explain why distance acuity might be better through the intermediate corridor of a Zeiss progressive lens in 1.67? The Rx is -10.25 Right and -10.0 Left.

Will it help if the lenses are...

Darryl Meister,

Or anyone else!!

A question for you.

I am a consumer who has a new set of Zeiss progressive lenses and I have better distance acuity from the intermediate portion of the lens...