Ovations:
- Pretty much the same as Panamic - of course Essilor will say it is different to keep Panamic price higher.
- I find that the minimum fitting height to be 19mm to get large enough reading area. It is not just the add that increases as you go lower on a Progressive, but the width of the reading area increases also.
- Has a maximum fitting Height about 24mm I think. The add decreases if you look lower than this.
- Not much intermediate area compared to Natural.
- Good overall lens.
Natural:
- Pretty much same as Comfort. Good standard lens with high success rate.
- Minimum fitting height for success: 21mm - my opinion
- larger intermediate area so better for people who need the intermediate vision.
- More distance peripheral distortions than panamic
- no maximum fitting height.
-I havent heard people complain of a narrow reading area, but then the higher the add, the narrower the reading area in most progressives.
- Pretty much the same as Panamic - of course Essilor will say it is different to keep Panamic price higher.
- I find that the minimum fitting height to be 19mm to get large enough reading area. It is not just the add that increases as you go lower on a Progressive, but the width of the reading area increases also.
- Has a maximum fitting Height about 24mm I think. The add decreases if you look lower than this.
- Not much intermediate area compared to Natural.
- Good overall lens.
Natural:
- Pretty much same as Comfort. Good standard lens with high success rate.
- Minimum fitting height for success: 21mm - my opinion
- larger intermediate area so better for people who need the intermediate vision.
- More distance peripheral distortions than panamic
- no maximum fitting height.
-I havent heard people complain of a narrow reading area, but then the higher the add, the narrower the reading area in most progressives.
Comment