OptiBoard Discussion Forums  

Go Back   OptiBoard Discussion Forums > Optical Forums > Ophthalmic Optics

Ophthalmic Optics Discussion of ophthalmic optics and related topics. Not for the faint of heart!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2009, 04:32 AM
John Karamouzis John Karamouzis is offline
OptiBoard Novice
Occupation: Lens Manufacturer
   

 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Greece
Posts: 6
John Karamouzis is on a distinguished road
"Freeform" Copyrights

Hello again ppl. I hope you are doing fine
I would like to know if the term "Freeform" is copyrighted by a company. I've know that Shamir tried to do that in Europe and they lost the trial in the courts. Normally this is a general term and I don't know if it can be copyrighted. Anyway if you know more please share the info. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2009, 08:32 AM
Judy Canty's Avatar
Judy Canty Judy Canty is offline
VA Licensed Optician
OptiBoard Gold Supporter
Occupation: Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 4,153
Blog Entries: 1
Judy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond reputeJudy Canty has a reputation beyond repute
Freeform is a registered trademark by Shamir. Hence, the little "r" in a circle as a superscript in their literature.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:05 AM
Jacqui's Avatar
Jacqui Jacqui is offline
Underemployed Genius
Occupation: Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
   

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frostbite Falls, Mn.
Posts: 5,180
Blog Entries: 2
Jacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond reputeJacqui has a reputation beyond repute
Seems like a lot of companies are using the term without referenceing to Shamir. I thought Seiko owned it.
__________________
Chocolate is cheaper than therapy (and tastier, too )

"Man who say it cannot be done, should not interrupt woman doing it" - Confusious
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:16 AM
shanbaum's Avatar
shanbaum shanbaum is offline
Objection!
Occupation: Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Manchester, CT USA
Posts: 2,490
shanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to behold
Shamir has four current trademarks involving the use of the word "freeform", as you can see here:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...h=Submit+Query

The two most general marks, "Freeform" and "Freeform Technology" are claimed for "software for the production of eyeglass lenses". Interestingly, the drawing provided as evidence of use of these two trademarks (use in commerce being required for the registration to be effective) was a sheet of labels, apparently the same sheet for both, which almost certainly were applied to lenses, and not to software.

Generally, a word that was in general use in a trade prior to registration will not be enforceable as a trademark - for instance, if you managed to register "progressive addition" as a trademark for a certain kind of lens, and you sued someone for infringing on your trademark, you would almost certainly lose, and your trademark would be invalidated.

Disclaimer: My comments are offered for educational purposes, and not as legal advice. I am not your lawyer.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:18 AM
rbaker's Avatar
rbaker rbaker is offline
Retired geezer
Occupation: Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Massachusetts & Oregon
Posts: 2,136
Blog Entries: 1
rbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant future
If you go to the US Patent and Trademark Office web site and perform a Boolean search "freeform AND lens"you will find this:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4001:vkdf3f.3.1

and:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4001:vkdf3f.3.2

in both cases attributing the Registrant as Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH GMBH FED REP GERMANY 73430 Turnstrasse 27 Aalen FED REP GERMANY
__________________
Dick

www.aerovisiontech.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:25 AM
rbaker's Avatar
rbaker rbaker is offline
Retired geezer
Occupation: Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Massachusetts & Oregon
Posts: 2,136
Blog Entries: 1
rbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant future
By the way, here is a patent citation for "freeform lenses."

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...eform+AND+lens
.
__________________
Dick

www.aerovisiontech.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:29 AM
rbaker's Avatar
rbaker rbaker is offline
Retired geezer
Occupation: Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Massachusetts & Oregon
Posts: 2,136
Blog Entries: 1
rbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant futurerbaker has a brilliant future
Here is Shamir's US patent:

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...eform+AND+lens
,
__________________
Dick

www.aerovisiontech.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:29 AM
shanbaum's Avatar
shanbaum shanbaum is offline
Objection!
Occupation: Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Manchester, CT USA
Posts: 2,490
shanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to beholdshanbaum is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbaker View Post
If you go to the US Patent and Trademark Office web site and perform a Boolean search "freeform AND lens"you will find this:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4001:vkdf3f.3.1

and:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4001:vkdf3f.3.2

in both cases attributing the Registrant as Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH GMBH FED REP GERMANY 73430 Turnstrasse 27 Aalen FED REP GERMANY
Actually, Dick, those are trademarks for the words "Morphing Generation" and a mark including them. What makes the application interesting is that it illustrates the casual use and general applicability of the term "freeform", albeit long after Shamir's registration.

Jacqui, what Seiko has (roughly) is a patent covering lenses that combine corrections for presbyopia and astigmatism on the back surface of a lens.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2009, 02:06 AM
Darryl Meister's Avatar
Darryl Meister Darryl Meister is offline
Carl Zeiss Vision, Americas
OptiBoard Corporate Sponsor
OptiBoard Gold Supporter
Occupation: Lens Manufacturer
   

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,733
Darryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud ofDarryl Meister has much to be proud of
This is often a poorly understood topic.

If the application of this information is important, you should have an official trademark search conducted. As Dick noted, you can get started with a free search at the USPTO's website to check the status of trademark applications filed in the United States. And note that you want to search trademarks, not patents.

Yes, it is difficult to obtain trademark protection for a word commonly used to describe the actual product, itself. It would be difficult, for instance, to trademark the word "Apple" for a line of apple pies, although you could trademark "Apple" for a line of computers.

And the word "freeform" or "free-form" is indeed a word that describes a type of irregular surface, particularly in the lexicon of optics surface, computer modeling, and numerically-controlled milling.

In fact, several companies own trademarks on the word "freeform" to describe everything from office furniture to exercise videos.

A search of the USPTO's trademark database lists several applications by Shamir for phrases that include the word "freeform," such as "Shamir Freeform Cosmetics," but I found only one live registration for the single word "Freeform," which describes "Software for the production of eyeglass lenses." Several other applications had been abandoned.

However, if you have more than a passing interest in this topic, or would like to find out for certain whether a particular word is available for protection in the US or elsewhere, I would highly recommend contacting an agency or attorney that specializes in trademarks or similar intellectual property matters.
__________________
Darryl J. Meister, ABOM
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2009, 03:58 AM
John Karamouzis John Karamouzis is offline
OptiBoard Novice
Occupation: Lens Manufacturer
   

 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Greece
Posts: 6
John Karamouzis is on a distinguished road
Ok that seems to be the best solution. I just wanted an opinion of if you heard sth about it. Thank you very much for your time people. ^_^
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Curve ball" selected as "best" optical illusion rinselberg Just Conversation 6 06-07-2009 09:03 PM
Dispensing via "drop-shipping" vs. "from the board" ilanh General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum 15 12-07-2007 11:14 AM
Where to find "science screensaver" and similar "@home" downloads rinselberg Just Conversation 0 10-24-2006 02:12 PM
Uncle D needs to explain "Hypothosis" and "Theory". Darris Chambless General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum 11 04-08-2001 02:42 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright ©1995-2008, Steve Machol. All rights reserved.
OptiBoard® is a registered trademark of Steve Machol and OptiBoard, Inc.

OptiBoard is proudly sponsored by:
Younger Optics, Carl Zeiss Vision, VisionWeb, and Vision Systems, Inc.