I just sold a Panamic
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Varilux Physio Enhanced Lenses
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by drk View PostSorry to be a wet blanket, but how in the world can anyone give Essilor any cred on a new product?
They routinely misrepresent and obfuscate...
they're all for adds of +2.50 ... my worst clients for other FF. So I'm tryin these.
B
Comment
-
I just can't get that excited about progressives anymore. We had a frame rep that swore up and down that all she could wear was the latest and greatest in lens design. She tried the 'older' designs years ago and she hated them!! She brought a pair of sunglasses and we put in some progressives. She claimed they were wonderful and the vision was great! She was dying to know what lens we used. We told her, VIP. Oh that was great!!
To be honest I have never encountered a lens that didn't work. As long as you select and fit correctly they'll be fine. Don't get me wrong I sell the crap out of these newer designs....it's just...well the thrill is gone!!!
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Judy Canty;330291
The PDF's take a little long to load, but they've got good information.[/QUOTE]
Lee Pruit said:Psst! It is not us. It's you opticians that keep ordering them.
:bbg: :hammer:Indeed.
Why don't they promote more choices from non E sources?
Ophthalmic Optician, Society to Advance Opticianry
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fezz View PostWho said?
I have heard rumor that the Panamic has been set for retirement, but I have yet to hear any rumor or bitter chattering about the Ellipse.
I heard that Ellipse is being renamed something mystical like "Varilux Short".Ophthalmic Optician, Society to Advance Opticianry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johns View PostLee Pruit said: To which Judy replied:
This thread is a good example of what I was referring to in the "monopoly" thread. This isn't a bash on Luzerne, but a comment on independent labs in general.
Why don't they promote more choices from non E sources?
Comment
-
Originally posted by DragonLensmanWV View PostI always wondered how Varilux lenses could be improved, because if you believe their advertising, they're already perfect. So how can you improve on perfection?
I can't recall hearing them called "perfect". "Best" - sure. And best is best, until the next best comes along! ;)...Just ask me...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johns View PostWhy don't they promote more choices from non E sources?
What if they were to walk into this guys account:
Originally posted by UilleannThere are *plenty* of us who use Essilor lenses, and many other large multi-national lens manufacturers products with *great* success. Simply put - they work. And very very well for many of us. They're also cheaper to some of us than just about any other option. They offer a very wide selection of lenses for a wide selection of lifestyles and vision needs. They have a killer warranty. They have some pretty amazing representation out in the field (hat tip in our Pete's general direction). Are they "perfect"? Nope. But neither is *ANY* other lens manufacturer on this little rock we call home. Misrepresent? No more than *ANY* other lens manufacturer I've ever met.
No need to be a hater! :shiner::p:cheers::cheers::cheers:
Now what happens to the lab rep or the lab? So the choices are there but you need to ask.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Judy Canty View PostWe do, but the vast majority keep ordering the same old stuff.
I don't order E products anymore because they are continually degrading this business to the point where the future is questionable. Very much like these economic bubble lately, it's all about the dollar now and they're burning my bridge not theirs so what's the problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by YrahG View PostNow what happens to the lab rep or the lab? So the choices are there but you need to ask.
The products you promote should be the ones you believe in, regardless of manufacturer and that needs to be reflected in your patient literature and become a part of your conversations with your patients.
--stepping down from my "thinking independently" soapbox.
Comment
Comment