I've now been wearing the Camber lenses for several months and recently gotten a 2nd pair of them. Although I originally stated that I didn't notice any "wow" factors in wearing them, I have to admit, I find myself preferring to put on the camber lenses over my numerous other types of freeform progressives. They are just more comfortable to wear. I admit this is not a technical review, but Cambers are good lenses in my opinion.
The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
I'm not sure how Camber would benefit even hyperopes. But it does open up add power possibilities. we have done +4.50 adds. The practicality of such a thing is dubious but there is a demand for it.
Can you file VSP on the camber lens? if so...how
Isn't the VSP PLXpression a lens with Camber technology???? Sure sounds like it.
Guess that answers Tx11's question.
I'm actually wearing a pair right now, and they are not bad. I still like my Individual 2 better though. I only have a 1.25 add, but a -3.00 cyl on both eyes. The reading area might be just a slight bit bigger, but when you get to the edge of the corridor, it is much more noticable than either my Ind.2, or my Autograph 3's.
Yes. Its as branded as any other "labs" house lens. Its still the Camber blank though, the Younger symbol is very noticeable.
It is a great lens.
The charge backs are the same as any other lens, thats how VSP works... there are catagories, some of which can seem rather arbitrary.
There are certain Unity "savings" programs you can get kick backs for combining Unity AR and one of their lenses, but if you take VSP don't you get bombarded with the same amount of brochures and stuff as me? Maybe you just send it to the circular floor file
Anyway its a great lens.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks