So the debate is 'minimal health care standards' versus the retort of 'Optometry is insincerely overstating the public health risks of DIY specs.'
Will Optometry win that debate in the arena that matters?
The NIH was mentioned early in the thread. Is there some way to engineer clinical studies proving our point? Can docs at least document the anecdotes of DIYs they end up treating? I wonder if the AOA can mobilize some persuasive science to cut through popular default economic skepticism and Win The Argument.
Bookmarks