Originally Posted by
Uilleann
The red scare has now morphed into the blue scare. And it's even more nebulous today.
Until there is peer reviewed hard data showing actual damage to humans, related to a specific frequency or frequency range, along with energy exposure levels over time, I'll remain suspicious. Further, I'm sure any one of these cats could easily write up a large research grant proposal to develop an optical scanning machine capable of objectively measuring luminous output of every electronic screen being sold on the market today. Such as device should easily be able to quantify each screen's transmission of frequency and power across their entire operational range, and with all user controllable settings engaged as well. With this information plotted, one could, objectively, determine which screens might pose any form of hazzard to human eyes, relative to what settings, distances and time viewed. Assuming of course, that direct correlations can be shown between human retinal damage, and specific frequency and luminance exposure.
Bookmarks