Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: Hoya/Seiko Nightmare

  1. #1
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9

    Hoya/Seiko Nightmare

    I feel like our shop is under siege because of the AR failures with Seiko lenses since the Hoya takeover. Are we the only ones experiencing this? We have for years ordered our lenses direct from Seiko in Hopkins, Minnesota or New Jersey (Prominent, Prestige II, etc). Hoya, as you know took over their labs earlier this year, closed them down, and moved everything to Dallas. ALL the CR-39 jobs with AR failed within the first four months. We are on the second round of do-overs with many patients. Now 9 months later we are starting to see more Trivex fails.

    We have been assured everything was fixed by July 13, but how to know? I feel like we are in a news blackout. I know not many optical shops ordered their lenses directly from Seiko (formerly Pentax), but we can't be the only ones in this situation. Anyone else?

    We gave up on Seiko PALs in July and have moved most of our business to Shamir through Luzerne, but, wow, we sold a lot of Seiko product this year and I fear a never-ending re-do scenario.

    Thanks for reading my rant. Let me know if you have any insights or similar situations.
    Last edited by huladude456; 09-20-2015 at 07:56 PM.

  2. #2
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9
    I guess we are in the minority with this problem! Do any of you good people order lenses directly from Seiko (formerly Pentax)? We had a great relationship with them until the lab in Minnesota was closed. Oh well, onwards and upwards!

  3. #3
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Gold Supporter Judy Canty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    7,482
    Seiko products are available through Luzerne as well.

  4. #4
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    178
    Interesting to hear of the issues you're having. I work at an office thats a big Hoya user (in California) and while we have certainly seen some AR issues in the past, nothing like you are experiencing. We do not use Seiko products thus its a completely different experience. Best of luck!

  5. #5
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9
    In fairness to Hoya, who we have used in the past, much of the problem seems to be meshing the Seiko product into the Hoya system. But, we are the ones who have to face the unsatisfied customers. It wasn't a well-handled transition to the Cleveland, then Dallas Hoya facility. I'm just crossing my fingers that the newest re-do lenses will hold up.

  6. #6
    Optician Extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Somewhere warm
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,130
    Is it just the Seiko products or Hoya ones too? We used to use that Hoya lab but stopped about 5 years ago.

    I live less than 3 miles from it!

  7. #7
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9
    The problems are only with the Seiko products that are now processed by Hoya in Dallas. We never had any AR problems with Hoya lenses from their Hartford lab. That's why the whole thing is so unnerving. Anyway, we have moved on, but I was just hoping to commiserate with someone else.

  8. #8
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,428
    I've never had a problem with the (few) lenses I've ordered from Seiko directly. That said, I get most of my Seiko lenses from other labs.

  9. #9
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    MI
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    281
    Many years ago, Sola (having just been purchased by Zeiss, but were still largely acting like Sola) came out with their Teflon F2 formula. Locally, it was basically Carat Advantage with anti-static properties.

    It was a complete bust, but not because of the coating being bad. The coating was great! In fact, the next version of Teflon performed terribly by comparison in my experience.

    The reason F2 failed was because there was a directive for labs to use up their existing Teflon original lens blanks. Teflon had always been awful up until F2, so switching products on consumers was a dirty nasty trick and it backfired by making the new product look awful.

    Perhaps, maybe just maybe, the new centralized lab at Hoya is trying to burn through inventory that is not the ordered product. They may have inherited a bunch of stock lenses that otherwise would not get used.

    It is just a thought.

  10. #10
    Master OptiBoarder optical24/7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Down on the Farm
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,810
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneGuy View Post
    The reason F2 failed was because there was a directive for labs to use up their existing Teflon original lens blanks. Teflon had always been awful up until F2, so switching products on consumers was a dirty nasty trick and it backfired by making the new product look awful.


    .
    Who the heck AR's prior to surfacing?

  11. #11
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    MI
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by optical24/7 View Post
    Who the heck AR's prior to surfacing?
    Apparently the lab had premade stock single vision lenses that all they had to do were edge.

  12. #12
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by Judy Canty View Post
    Seiko products are available through Luzerne as well.
    This is the best place to get the Seiko PALs. If you want to pay the most, get them directly through Seiko.

  13. #13
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Elmer J Fudd's yacht
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    709
    Quote Originally Posted by huladude456 View Post
    I feel like our shop is under siege because of the AR failures with Seiko lenses since the Hoya takeover. Are we the only ones experiencing this? We have for years ordered our lenses direct from Seiko in Hopkins, Minnesota or New Jersey (Prominent, Prestige II, etc). Hoya, as you know took over their labs earlier this year, closed them down, and moved everything to Dallas. ALL the CR-39 jobs with AR failed within the first four months. We are on the second round of do-overs with many patients. Now 9 months later we are starting to see more Trivex fails.

    We have been assured everything was fixed by July 13, but how to know? I feel like we are in a news blackout. I know not many optical shops ordered their lenses directly from Seiko (formerly Pentax), but we can't be the only ones in this situation. Anyone else?

    We gave up on Seiko PALs in July and have moved most of our business to Shamir through Luzerne, but, wow, we sold a lot of Seiko product this year and I fear a never-ending re-do scenario.

    Thanks for reading my rant. Let me know if you have any insights or similar situations.
    Although this rant has not been vetted, the same cannot be said for the Canadian market. Seiko coatings are still being done by a distributor and are ok at best in quality. Hoya however still has the best quality coatings in Canada. May take a day or so longer to receive, but worth the wait!

    Note: Seiko products are not available through Hoya in Canada.

  14. #14
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by huladude456 View Post
    I feel like our shop is under siege because of the AR failures with Seiko lenses since the Hoya takeover. Are we the only ones experiencing this? We have for years ordered our lenses direct from Seiko in Hopkins, Minnesota or New Jersey (Prominent, Prestige II, etc). Hoya, as you know took over their labs earlier this year, closed them down, and moved everything to Dallas. ALL the CR-39 jobs with AR failed within the first four months. We are on the second round of do-overs with many patients. Now 9 months later we are starting to see more Trivex fails.

    We have been assured everything was fixed by July 13, but how to know? I feel like we are in a news blackout. I know not many optical shops ordered their lenses directly from Seiko (formerly Pentax), but we can't be the only ones in this situation. Anyone else?

    We gave up on Seiko PALs in July and have moved most of our business to Shamir through Luzerne, but, wow, we sold a lot of Seiko product this year and I fear a never-ending re-do scenario.

    Thanks for reading my rant. Let me know if you have any insights or similar situations.
    Why don't you get Seiko from Luzerne?

  15. #15
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9
    Here is what I know; please correct me if I am wrong. The direct retail product from Seiko/Pentax is called PERFAS. The lenses available through Hopkins, Minnesota were called Prominent, Prestige, and Premiere. I believe these lenses to be very similar to the Seiko offerings of Supercede, Supernal and Surmount that you can order from many labs. The prices on the Perfas product was very good and was processed by the lab in Minnesota. That lab is now closed and Hoya Dallas is processing the Perfas product. Something odd happened early on in the move to Dallas with the CR-39 AR jobs. Hard coat mis-match? I don't know. But I've got a 3-page print out of every CR-39 AR Perfas job between January and July 14 and we are working through replacing each and every one. Because the problem was not identified or fixed until July 14, I have replaced these lenses more than once for some of my customers. Can you feel my frustration? I don't have any more facts at my disposal because none are given to me by Hoya or Seiko, except they have fixed the problem. We haven't ordered a single job from Hoya/Seiko/Pentax since July. We are done. I have been pleased with Luzerne and the Shamir Autograph II lenses we have been dispensing since then.

  16. #16
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9
    I find it hard to believe that no one on this chat board ever used Seiko PERFAS product direct from Hopkins, Minnesota during this time period. They always seemed busy when I called in an order!

  17. #17
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,428
    Premier II = Supercede II
    Prominent = Supernal
    Prestige = Surmount

    Same lenses, different names

  18. #18
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,428
    BTW, Superior = Superior They ran out of acceptable names starting with "Pr"

  19. #19
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    vermont
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    9
    I always wondered if the Perfas lenses were the exact same product in Seiko.

  20. #20
    OptiBoard Apprentice
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Saskatoon, Canada
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    35
    I thought that Prestige and Surmount were the same design, but Prestige was backside surfaced while Surmount was dual surfaced? Is that wrong?

  21. #21
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by stedel View Post
    I thought that Prestige and Surmount were the same design, but Prestige was backside surfaced while Surmount was dual surfaced? Is that wrong?
    Yes, that's wrong -- same lens

  22. #22
    OptiBoard Apprentice
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Saskatoon, Canada
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by jefe View Post
    Yes, that's wrong -- same lens
    The thing is... I know a lab that does Prestige lenses, but I know for a fact that they don't do any dual surfacing whatsoever. But I was told by another lab that does Surmount that they always surface both sides of any + RX in a Surmount. So... what's going on?

  23. #23
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Elmer J Fudd's yacht
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    709
    Quote Originally Posted by stedel View Post
    The thing is... I know a lab that does Prestige lenses, but I know for a fact that they don't do any dual surfacing whatsoever. But I was told by another lab that does Surmount that they always surface both sides of any + RX in a Surmount. So... what's going on?
    No other lens company other than Hoya is processing any double surface processing designs. No Seiko design contains double surface processing.

  24. #24
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    MI
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by Lab Insight View Post
    No other lens company other than Hoya is processing any double surface processing designs. No Seiko design contains double surface processing.
    That is false, when talking about 1.74. I think Seiko does on 1.74, and I know zeiss does on 1.74. For Zeiss it has to be done out of country.

  25. #25
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Elmer J Fudd's yacht
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    709
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneGuy View Post
    That is false, when talking about 1.74. I think Seiko does on 1.74, and I know zeiss does on 1.74. For Zeiss it has to be done out of country.
    No sir, it is true. They all play into the BS marketing jargon. Are those you referring to available in Transitions?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Seiko Selling Optical Products Divsion to Hoya?
    By sharpstick777 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-23-2016, 04:09 PM
  2. Earthquakes, Hoya, Seiko...
    By tdj in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 08:18 AM
  3. hoya 1.70 vs. seiko 1.74
    By jamie w in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-07-2009, 08:15 PM
  4. Seiko 1.67 / Hoya 1.71 question
    By New2opti in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-26-2006, 10:04 AM
  5. seiko 1.67 or hoya 1.70???
    By Eduardo in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-22-2005, 07:28 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •