Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Does AR really cause multiple images for night driving?

  1. #1

    Does AR really cause multiple images for night driving?

    I'm hoping someone here may shed some light (pardon the expression) on something I heard the other day.

    Patient comes in & while discussing coatings, she said she had read some new information that was researched by an Australian company. Apparently glare & reflection are big issues Down Under as the sun is very bright there. The Aussies are on the forefront of contact lens resesarch also.

    The research said that when driving at night, the main visual problem was not so much reflections but the eye receiving multiple images from (1) oncoming headlights, (2) street lights & signs, & (3) light bouncing off the road surface when wet. The researchers had concluded that AR actually exaggerates & increases the multiple images, aggravating night driving. This is contrary to what most of us have been telling folks! Most people I know who have AR say it helps their night driving. Anyone have a handle on this?

    eyevay

  2. #2
    Forever Liz's Dad Steve Machol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Back in AZ
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    10,252
    Sorry but that sounds like nonsense. A/R Coatings reduce internal reflections like this - not increase them.

    Do you know the name of this company or have a link to this research?


    OptiBoard Administrator
    ----
    OptiBoard has been proudly serving the Eyecare Community since 1995.

  3. #3
    Well that's what I thought too. Pt. kept saying that the issue was "images" not "reflections" but I don't really understand what this means. If I see the person again I will ask for more info on who did this resesarch.

  4. #4
    Forever Liz's Dad Steve Machol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Back in AZ
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    10,252
    Where exactly does he think the 'mulitple' images comes from? The only source (other than alcohol!) would be reflections. ;)


    OptiBoard Administrator
    ----
    OptiBoard has been proudly serving the Eyecare Community since 1995.

  5. #5
    Bad address email on file optigoddess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    342
    Hi, Joy! (Eyevay) -

    I know this is off-topic, but HOW ARE YOU!?! and Where are you? ! ?

    Curiously yours-

    Karen

  6. #6
    Bad address email on file John R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Yorkshire, U.K.
    Occupation
    Consumer or Non-Eyecare field
    Posts
    3,189

    Big Smile

    Well from personal experience. I can assure you that ARC does NOT make multiple images worse....And as for No 3 we get plenty of that here and if i ain't got my ARC glasses i have to take them off to drive as its soo much worse.
    Must be a company with a new product too sell and first they need to discredit the competition.

  7. #7
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    238
    This is news to me too. I tend to agree with Steve. I'd be curious to know the name of the Aussie company. The only lens company with a research department in Australia is Sola (to my knowledge). The universities certainly have research departments and, as you say eyevay, the University of NSW is a world leader in contact lens research. John may also have a point. recetly heard of one lens company using the polariscope to highlight what they called chromatism in a polycarbonate lens. I like to think that it is ignorance though, John.

    Regards
    David

  8. #8
    since 1964 Homer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Estes Park, Colorado, usa
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    754

    About a 100 years ago .... more or less.

    I had been in the optical business for about 3 years when I got my first -.50 OU at age 23. I loved them .... except at night. There were other images, images of the on-comming headlights that moved around as I moved my head. I could make some of them disappear when I looked directly at a light source. The opticians in the office called them ghost images. It think that is a good term.

    The researchers are right, it is not reflections that are confusing and frustrating, it is the ghost images. Of course they are cause by the external and internal reflections at the lens surfaces which can be greatly reduced by anti-reflection coatings ..... which reduce the reflections which are experienced as ghost images.

    Think the patient mis read the researchers results related to anti-reflection / anti-ghost image coatings. I know that I, and a host of my patients would not be caught dirving with a naked lens.

    Better have the patient bring you the article.

  9. #9
    Master OptiBoarder Texas Ranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    1,433

    Smilie

    not mentioned in the source of multiple reflections is the biggest problem, the windshield. so, it's like this, you have a lot of reflection problems, so why add to those others with non-ar lenses? would you have all those reflection problems is you wore NO glasses? so the premise is way wrong...

  10. #10
    Independent Problem Optiholic edKENdance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    In the Middle
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    2,630
    I think I've seen some newer mini-vans driving around with a/r windshields, I might be mistaken but they kind of have a purple hue when you see them through polarised lenses.

  11. #11
    opti-tipster harry a saake's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    lake norman, north carolina
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    2,099

    Confused AR

    Strangely enough on page 36 of nov 20/20 Joseph Bruneni has wrote an article stating that ar causes reflections. I know i,m confused and certainly would like to invite Mr. Bruneni to the board here , so he could explain to us what he means and what he is basing that on. Anyone know Joseph?
    Last edited by harry a saake; 11-17-2002 at 08:44 PM.

  12. #12
    Independent Problem Optiholic edKENdance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    In the Middle
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    2,630
    That's just plain wacky. A light source and a surface create reflections. As I explain to customers on a daily basis, the only reason you see that green/red whatever reflection(no it's not a tint) on the lense is because that's the only colour in the spectrum that's not passing through it. When most all light is reflected it's white which is certainly more natural for our eyes to see but when you put a reflective surface between your eyes and the world, the more light that can pass through it, the better.
    Bring on Mr. Bruneni!

  13. #13
    OptiWizard
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Geezerville, AZ USA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    353
    We're trying to get Joe's complete reply but, here's a start:

    "Regarding your question about an article in 20/20, I'm handicapped because our November 20/20 issues haven't arrived yet. I'm puzzled by several things. I write for a number of Jobson publications but not normally for 20/20. Second, I can't imagine I would write that AR causes reflections. Let's wait until I see that issue and then I'll get back to you."

    Harry, can you verify the magazine just to make sure; I'll see Joe this week at OLA and we can get a definitive answer for ya.

  14. #14
    opti-tipster harry a saake's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    lake norman, north carolina
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    2,099

    Ar

    :D Jim, i didnt mean you wrote this, i believe it was Joe, unfortunately when i came home tonight my wife had thrown out the magazine. As i remember it was 20/20 and it was on page 36. It will be a few days before i am home as i am heading up to the AFOS convention in Williamsburg, and it will probably be friday before i get home.

  15. #15
    OptiBoard Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    New Delhi,India
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    20

    Stick out tongue

    This is coming from India,& I am very selective while suggesting ARC to my patients.You see there is plenty of dust in India,& we indians are very comfortable,wiping our glasses with our shirt,without wetting the lens!!!
    The moment a patient collects his ARC glasses,he is pretty satisfied,but comes back fuming in a weeks time.Reason:His glasses are making night driving horrible!Why?Take a look at those ARC lenses,& you wo'nt recognise them,since they are so badly scratched up!!!!!!
    Look at the car's windshield,& you'll find why night driving is impossible!

  16. #16
    OptiBoard Professional
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    USA
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    408

    In a nutshell.

    spexwala said: Look at the car's windshield,& you'll find why night driving is impossible!
    Brilliant deduction, spexwala. We are so attentive to the issues of the medium in the eyeglass frame but too easily forget the medium in the auto window frame.

  17. #17
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Posts
    1

    Arrow

    This is in reply to the comment that an article by me in 20/20 stated that AR causes reflections.

    There's several things wrong with this comment. First, the story was in the November EYECARE BUSINESS, not 20/20 (a minor point). Let me quote directly from the story ("Lenses for Computer Users") which was in the section talking about reflected glare from monitors. Here's what I wrote:

    "Another component in CVS involves reflected glare from monitors. The best way to eliminate this is to reposition the monitor or overhead lights. When this is not practical, monitors can be fit with an anti-reflective glare screen. Although AR coatings actually increase the amount of reflected glare reaching the eyes, AR provides other benefits and is usually a useful addition to your patients' computer eyewear."

    The key statement was the last sentence. Adding AR to an ophthalmic lens increases the light transmission THROUGH the lens so that more of the reflected glare FROM THE SCREEN enters the eye. It was NOT implying or stating that AR causes reflections.

    I do make mistakes and/or omissions in these stories so I'm always glad to hear from readers. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I spent some time on that statement, knowing it might be mis-understood. I probably should have added the words "FROM THE MONITOR" after the words "reflected glare".

  18. #18
    Forever Liz's Dad Steve Machol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Back in AZ
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    10,252
    That makes perfect sense Joe. Thanks for clearing this up. It just goes to show you that it's better to go directly to the source than rely on second or third hand accounts. Things often get lost in the translation from one source to another.


    OptiBoard Administrator
    ----
    OptiBoard has been proudly serving the Eyecare Community since 1995.

  19. #19
    opti-tipster harry a saake's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    lake norman, north carolina
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    2,099
    :hammer: Joe, yes let me be the first to apologize for misunderstanding what you meant, and then on top of that not having the magazine to go back to it, as everyone had trashed it. I realized it wasn,t 20/20, but then i could not remember what it was. I,ll make it a point to read more carefully in the future.

  20. #20
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    South Africa
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    1
    hi there,

    im new here and stumbled upon this site while doing research. I find this discussion very interesting and I wholley agree with what Mr. Joe Bruneni says about ARC not being very effective for computer use ( unless placed on back surface of the lenses if you have an overhead flourescent light behind you).

    but he did say that AR coatings have other benefits and is a useful addition to patients computer eyewear. I'd like to know from him exactly what these other benefits are and why.

    This has always been a contentious point of discussion here in SA as many Optoms advocate an ARC as soon as they hear the px is a computer user. Surely considerations such as lighting, arrangement of work surfaces in the office, with regards to windows etc and orientation of the computer monitor itself need to be discussed before an ARC is hastily slapped on.

    I agree with spexwala - pxs dont always look after their specs and therefore it must be a very well considered decision to prescribe ARC.

    That said, I am 8 months out of the University of Johannesburg and Im finding it very useful to hear from ppl who are far more experienced.

  21. #21
    OptiBoardaholic eyeguy21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    240
    Quote Originally Posted by Texas Ranger View Post
    not mentioned in the source of multiple reflections is the biggest problem, the windshield. so, it's like this, you have a lot of reflection problems, so why add to those others with non-ar lenses? would you have all those reflection problems is you wore NO glasses? so the premise is way wrong...

    Stole my thunder. I can't tell you how many problems resolve themselves when I ask them "when was the last time you cleaned your windshield?". Never heard of a good, uncompromised ARC that caused problems with night driving.
    "Wise men don't need advice. Fools won't take it." - Benjamin Franklin.

  22. #22
    Eyes eastward... Uilleann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,237
    To be technical - if I understand the mechanism behind a/r lenses, they do indeed create a reflection. However, it's effect is offset to the incoming light rays and set up to cancel out the waveform. So it could be said that in order to cancel reflection, these lenses have to first create a small additional reflection (and most importantly have that reflection offset by a quarter wavelength). Would y'all say that's correct-ish at all?

  23. #23
    Rochester Optical WFruit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    1,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Uilleann View Post
    To be technical - if I understand the mechanism behind a/r lenses, they do indeed create a reflection. However, it's effect is offset to the incoming light rays and set up to cancel out the waveform. So it could be said that in order to cancel reflection, these lenses have to first create a small additional reflection (and most importantly have that reflection offset by a quarter wavelength). Would y'all say that's correct-ish at all?
    You are correct sir. (It sound's better in Ed McMahon's voice....)

    And yes, cleaning your windshield, especially the INSIDE will greatly benefit your driving vision.
    There are rules. Knowing those are easy. There are exceptions to the rules. Knowing those are easy. Knowing when to use them is slightly less easy. There are exceptions to the exceptions. Knowing those is a little more tricky, and know when to use those is even more so. Our industry is FULL of all of the above.

  24. #24
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    north of 49
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Uilleann View Post
    To be technical - if I understand the mechanism behind a/r lenses, they do indeed create a reflection. However, it's effect is offset to the incoming light rays and set up to cancel out the waveform. So it could be said that in order to cancel reflection, these lenses have to first create a small additional reflection (and most importantly have that reflection offset by a quarter wavelength). Would y'all say that's correct-ish at all?
    Correct-ish! and beautifully stated!:cheers:

  25. #25
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oakland, California
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,573
    A/R coatings use destructive interference, just as do noise-canceling headphones. Saying that they create reflections, while true, can mislead. When we decenter a lens to the proper pd, we create prism. Why would we do that? So there will effectively be no prism, right? Same thing; creation and negation are two sides of the same coin.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Help! Night Driving Glare Problems.....
    By skirk1975 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-27-2004, 07:59 PM
  2. Eye Images
    By Brent in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-21-2003, 09:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •