Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Position Of Wear (POW)

  1. #1
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    U. S.
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    137

    Position Of Wear (POW)

    How many of you take your progressive measurements and enhance them with POW (Vertex, Panto, and Facial form) measurements? I know they are pretty much required for the S series by Essilor but how about progressives like the Seiko Surmount, Physio DRx and Comfort DRx. Do they really make a noticeable difference to the patient? For those of you who do, what are the best measuring tools to use for each? Thanks in advance for your info.

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder DanLiv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    718
    Some lenses are designed to accommodate fit values, others are not. The Surmount is, and you're not getting the value of the lens if you don't make the measurements (the lab will just use default values, so by not providing the correct values the lens is being deliberately fabricated incorrectly). The Drx line is not intended to use fit values, so even if you supply them they will be ignored. (Although I have interestingly learned that fit values can be applied to some lenses that ostensibly do not use them; I have successfully received Spectrum with compensated Rxs.) The Varilux S come in 3 flavors: Design, Fit, and 4D. Fit and 4D should always have fit values, Design is a fixed corridor and does not use fit values.

    If you are taking fit values, use a lens that incorporates the information. If you are not, don't bother using a lens that uses it because you and your patient are paying a premium for little if any benefit. Not every Rx needs fit values and compensation, and standard (even conventional) designs still work just as well for them as fully compensated designs.

    We have Visioffice, which works very well. We do measure everyone with it as a matter of practice and to expose all our patients to the evolving technology of the industry. I end up fitting some of those patients with conventional finished SV so the technical values of the measurement are moot, but I have still educated them about the technology and primed them to expect the technology and look forward to it when their Rx may evolve into digital territory. If you invest in a digital measuring device it is worth using it most of the time as is it quick, accurate, and impressive to patients. There's little point in going backwards and pulling out pupilometers and lens markers when you no longer need to.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A bad position of wear.
    By drk in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-18-2013, 02:35 PM
  2. Memo on Understanding the Position of Wear
    By Darryl Meister in forum OptiBoard File Directory
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-18-2013, 05:43 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-14-2013, 02:04 PM
  4. What is a "position of wear" compensation meant to compared to?
    By Barry Santini in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 106
    Last Post: 12-25-2008, 02:53 PM
  5. What's happen with PALs when the frame is not in the right position of wear ?
    By Bobie in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-25-2006, 02:30 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •