Originally Posted by
Forrest
Dear All Buddies,
1. I have lot of patient complaining about the narrow intermediate zone of Zeiss Progressive Classic. Although, Zeiss claims that the "Classic" is a FreeForm lens, it cannot win the original "non-FreeForm" Hoya Summit-Pro. Is there any measure to reduce the non-adaptation rate please?
2. In Hong Kong, we has only original "Individual" available (not Individual2), also, people keep complaining the intermediate zone being too short and narrow. However, for "Plus2" and "Superb", I received no complaint at all. Thus, although the Zeiss claims that all Zeiss Progressive is based on so-call "Zeiss DNA", I think the profile and design of them are different. Can anyone share idea about that please?
4. Is the GT2 or GT2 3D with better intermediate zone please?
3. If I have a group of Px want to switch to Zeiss from Hoya, is there any quideline or hints which Zeiss PAL should I use please? (I want to keep at least similar intermidate zone width)
e.g......
HOYA Summit-Pro ----> Zeiss???
HOYA FD -------------> Zeiss???
HOYA iD --------------> Zeiss???
Sorry about my questions. I know that it is always not a good idea to switch a patient from a used PAL design to another brand, but sometime, if I cannot offer those patient HOYA PAL.
Forrest
Bookmarks