Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Simpler PALs

  1. #1
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Boston, USA
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    3

    Simpler PALs

    I'm trying to discern the advantages of various state-of-the-art PALs for a "simpler" prescription. The script in question is +0.75 Sph with +1.50 Add (same both eyes, and no astig.). The client is 52 year old mild hyperope whose presbyopia has now advanced to the point where he is considering "full-time" glasses. He currently does not wear glasses at all for distance but has begun to notice a potential need there especially when tired at end of day. He works at a computer all day (at a slightly farther than average distance of 36") and is happy using +1.25 otc readers at his desk. He is interested in a set of glasses for "everything else". He is willing to pay the premium for high end lenses. He is an engineer who researches his buying decisions thoroughly. He has suggested that he may want Varilux S or Shamir Autograph III - in Trivex with Transitions and Crizal. He has even suggested that he may wish the seg height to be set slightly low so as to give him maximum peripheral clarity at distance.

    He is shying away from traditional bifocals because he feels that having the intermediate range available could useful when these are the only glasses he has on him - and importantly, his wife is pushing for PALs because she feels that bifocals will make him look older.

    My question concerns the advantage of these high-end lenses for this kind of prescription. With a mild +, no cyl., and both eyes the same, the advantages of free-form (as I understand it) may not apply. However, as a non-eyeglass-wearer for most of his life, I think he will need a wide channel to be happy. What lenses do you think are most suitable here?

  2. #2
    Optician Extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Somewhere warm
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    3,130
    I think he is actually the kind of patient that would benefit from the best lenses! He's been doing research, he's an engineer(they are very picky) and he doesn't really need a correction for distance.

    People with small or no distance corrections often are pickier about their distance vision- they are used to seeing great and will notice any reduction in clairity on the sides of the lenses until their brain adjusts.

    Sell him the best, don't drop the height but try to use a metal frame with notepads. Also, don't oversell the lenses. Let him know that there will be an adjustment period and the best thing to do is for him to wear them as much as possible during this period.

  3. #3
    Compulsive Truthteller OptiBoard Gold Supporter Uncle Fester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    At a position without dimension...
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,309
    Welcome to Optiboard!

    I agree with the Auto 3 and everything Happylady says!

    My rx has some astig but is still quite minor and I really don't like to wear them for distance. My new Auto 2's 15mm fixed are working as good as any I've worn (maybe a dozen different types) but I'm not as picky as most engineers. (I think it's genetic.)

  4. #4
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    678
    at the word "engineer" immediately sell him/her the "best" lens available to you and STILL undersell it
    "what i need is a strong drink and a peer group." ... Douglas Adams - Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy

  5. #5
    One eye sees, the other feels OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wauwatosa Wi
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Dolphran View Post
    He is shying away from traditional bifocals because he feels that having the intermediate range available could useful when these are the only glasses he has on him - and importantly, his wife is pushing for PALs because she feels that bifocals will make him look older.
    Would "he" be "you" by any chance?

    My question concerns the advantage of these high-end lenses for this kind of prescription. With a mild +, no cyl., and both eyes the same, the advantages of free-form (as I understand it) may not apply.
    Right, I'll stick my neck out. Generally no advantage unless there are unusual fitting parameters. Even then it's marginal. Semi-finshed should be fine. Put the money you saved towards sunglasses, Rx readers, or if you're feeling charitable, the Lions Club.

    However, as a non-eyeglass-wearer for most of his life, I think he will need a wide channel to be happy.
    The channel/corridor won't be used here. Think generous distance and near zones. Fit close, spot on postioning by the book (don't cut the height unless you sit well above the desktop monitor), bump the panto tilt if there's room, use lightweight materials, and you're good to go, although he might still prefer the OTCs for reading at home.
    Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. - Richard P. Feynman

    Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test before the lesson.



  6. #6
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Portland
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    63
    As far as lowering the seg. ht. IMHO and Experience every Hyperope always likes just a little bit more add, so I would rarely lower the seg.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. change from PALs to short corridor PALs
    By cnet_baby in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-28-2011, 09:29 AM
  2. The hi-end PALs in my dream
    By Bobie in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-06-2009, 11:31 PM
  3. Seiko PALs
    By tktien in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-15-2007, 10:35 PM
  4. looking for OEM PALs
    By Arcturus in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2007, 01:32 AM
  5. Anisometropia In PALs
    By hardbox_happy in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-12-2006, 12:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •