Originally Posted by
optical24/7
"Attorneys representing the “dispensing opticians” such as LensCrafters and ECCA (rebranded as VisionWorks), had made the argument that the laws were discriminatory to opticians and optical chains as well as to interstate commerce, while the state of California argued that co-location could result in conflicts of interest. Having brought the case as far as an unsuccessful attempt to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, the plaintiffs have exhausted their opportunities for appeal"...
Imho, there are more "conflicts of interest" when the prescriber is also the seller.
Bookmarks