Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Plano Concave on 1.5 index?

  1. #1
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    79

    Plano Concave on 1.5 index?

    I received back a job from our lab today the rx was -6.50/-0.75x80 R+L the lenses were flat front surface, plano concave, I am sending them back and specifying a front curve for them but want to know the following,

    I am wanting to set the front curve at +2 to give it some curve to the lenses I know this will make the edge thickness worse but would there be any visual problems that might crop up from doing this? or problems regarding fit into frame?

    I will be using 1.67 index and specifying the +2 front curve, I am fitting into a nylon supra with a eye size of 58mm. frame is made from acetate plastic. O.C's are 31 R+L and height set at 26mm above rim.


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    3,089
    Edge thickness will not change (providing the index does not change): any curve added to the front just adds the same curve to the back, resulting in zero increase in edge thickness.

  3. #3
    Master OptiBoarder LENNY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    BROOKLYNSK, NY USA
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    4,351
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeAurelius View Post
    Edge thickness will not change (providing the index does not change): any curve added to the front just adds the same curve to the back, resulting in zero increase in edge thickness.
    Theoretically!
    According to the formulas!

    In real life it might be a bit thicker..... Just my experience...

  4. #4
    One eye sees, the other feels OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wauwatosa Wi
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,476
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeAurelius View Post
    Edge thickness will not change (providing the index does not change): any curve added to the front just adds the same curve to the back, resulting in zero increase in edge thickness.
    Flatter base curves do decrease the edge thickness. That's why aspheric (front) lenses are thinner; it's due to the flatter base curve, not the asphericity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bok View Post
    I received back a job from our lab today the rx was -6.50/-0.75x80 R+L the lenses were flat front surface, plano concave, I am sending them back and specifying a front curve for them but want to know the following,

    I am wanting to set the front curve at +2 to give it some curve to the lenses I know this will make the edge thickness worse but would there be any visual problems that might crop up from doing this? or problems regarding fit into frame?

    I will be using 1.67 index and specifying the +2 front curve, I am fitting into a nylon supra with a eye size of 58mm. frame is made from acetate plastic. O.C's are 31 R+L and height set at 26mm above rim.

    Bok, use the Base Curve that the lens manufacturer recommends, and place the vertical optics according to Martin's rule for tilt, unless the manufacturer recommends a center pupil position (Shamir), possibly with prism thinning. Try to fit close, and keep the pupil center no more than 5mm above center (the datum or 180 line).
    Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. - Richard P. Feynman

    Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test before the lesson.



  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Golden State
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    340
    58 eye size frame with -6.50 -0.75 Rx and 62 PD ???? I would question the frame choice before I place a redo for base curve.

  6. #6
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by GokhanSF View Post
    58 eye size frame with -6.50 -0.75 Rx and 62 PD ???? I would question the frame choice before I place a redo for base curve.
    Gokhan I have already questioned frame choice three times, customer is reglazing a frame he has purchased elsewhere and is stubborn and does not want to change it.

    Robert you have been very helpful, thank you very much.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Concave Molds
    By Alex_Rios in forum Optical Marketplace
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2010, 03:15 PM
  2. Need Bi-concave or Lenticular Hi-Index SV for Super High Minus
    By sharpstick777 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 08:19 PM
  3. Bi-Concave
    By Mike Fretto in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-27-2010, 08:34 AM
  4. Bi-concave lenses?
    By rsandr in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-06-2003, 02:34 PM
  5. Bi-Concave vs. Myodisk
    By Pete Hanlin in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-17-2001, 04:04 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •