Rx:
8.25-2.50x66
7.25-2.75x133
add 2.50
Using Younger Image Trilogy Trivex
8.50 bc
5.10 sag
Need help calculating laps. What say you? My software returns 112/337 rt and 212/462 lt. Doesnt sound right to me.
Rx:
8.25-2.50x66
7.25-2.75x133
add 2.50
Using Younger Image Trilogy Trivex
8.50 bc
5.10 sag
Need help calculating laps. What say you? My software returns 112/337 rt and 212/462 lt. Doesnt sound right to me.
OD 0.375/2.375
OS 1.375/4.125
Calculated with Visual Lab 2000
Clinton Tower
The intellect to live free is in short supply
ALT248=°
There is not enough information here to give you an adequate comparison. The frame size comes into play due to the center thickness caused by the plus power. The other question is whether you are using pad compensated tools or non compensated tools, and possibly what that pad compensation is.
Frame 53/18 non comp
Thanks scriptfiller
Scriptfiller's numbers are fairly close then. Your tool calculation seems rather high. Even with a 12mm center thickness I was only coming up with a 090 tool. Make sure the lens index is in the computer correctly.
Trivex the only option they are willing to consider?
A man went to an eye specialist to get his eyes tested and asked, "Doctor, will I be able to read after wearing glasses?"
"Yes, of course," said the doctor, "why not!"
"Oh! How nice it would be," said the patient with joy, "I have been illiterate for so long."
Safety. Company requires poly or trivex.
Ahhh, gottcha, didn't realize it was a safety job
A man went to an eye specialist to get his eyes tested and asked, "Doctor, will I be able to read after wearing glasses?"
"Yes, of course," said the doctor, "why not!"
"Oh! How nice it would be," said the patient with joy, "I have been illiterate for so long."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks