Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Why do some people refer to lense material as "substrate"

  1. #1
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    585

    Why do some people refer to lense material as "substrate"

    To me, substrate is an electronics term, used in the integrated circuits world. Substrate a base where circuits are "grown". Is it accurate to refer to the lens material as substrate? (I don't want anything growing on my lenses )

    Seems like polymer would be a more accurate term? Or maybe Monomer?

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder DanLiv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    729
    The word we should be using but aren't is "substratum" which means an underlying layer. It generically refers to the base lens regardless of material. Substrate is just incorrect usage of the word, but its easier to say and has kind of become the default term, though incorrect.

  3. #3
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Blue Jumper

    sub·strate/ˈsəbˌstrāt/


    Noun:

    1. A substance or layer that underlies something, or on which some process occurs, in particular.
    2. The surface or material on or from which an organism lives, grows, or obtains its nourishment.

  4. #4
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Connecticut
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    102
    The bottom of salt water fish tanks is called the substrate. That's what I immediately think of when I hear that word.

  5. #5
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    941
    It's only referred to as substrate with regards to coating application, in which case the term is correct as the substrate in any chemical reaction is the material that is reacted upon.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    3,089
    From my somewhat shaky memory, substrate comes from the precision optics arena, where the glass material is often coated, hence the glass becomes the substrate for the coating.

  7. #7
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Redhot Jumper and it is...............................

    Substrate may mean:


    Substrate may also mean:







  8. #8
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeAurelius View Post
    From my somewhat shaky memory, substrate comes from the precision optics arena, where the glass material is often coated, hence the glass becomes the substrate for the coating.
    That is the only think I could think of for why someone would call it substrate. But it seems so far off base to what we are really trying to convey, and has so many more accurate uses in other scientific fields that it just seems wrong to use when referring to the monomer that these coatings are applied. The only other reason I could think of to justify its usage is glass, which is not a monomer. Seems more accurate to just simply call it the lens, that is,...... unless lens = monomer + coatings

  9. #9
    OptiBoard Professional RT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    CT
    Occupation
    Lens Manufacturer
    Posts
    879
    There are many stages in the manufacturing life of a lens. "Polymer" or "Monomer" really refer to the lens while it is in its raw chemical stage. Once the lens has been cast or molded, it is more accurately called a substrate. From there, the lens blank may go on for further processing (i.e. adding a photochromic treatment, hard coat, AR coat, etc.). Especially when talking about a further step that transforms the lens (i.e. it was a clear lens, now it is a photochromic lens), it is necessary to distinguish between the lens blank pre- and post- transformation. Thus, we send "substrates" to the photochromic manfuacturer, who sends back "finished goods".

    From a lens manufacturing standpoint, the term "substrate" is both accurate and descriptive.
    RT

  10. #10
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by RT View Post
    There are many stages in the manufacturing life of a lens. "Polymer" or "Monomer" really refer to the lens while it is in its raw chemical stage. Once the lens has been cast or molded, it is more accurately called a substrate. From there, the lens blank may go on for further processing (i.e. adding a photochromic treatment, hard coat, AR coat, etc.). Especially when talking about a further step that transforms the lens (i.e. it was a clear lens, now it is a photochromic lens), it is necessary to distinguish between the lens blank pre- and post- transformation. Thus, we send "substrates" to the photochromic manfuacturer, who sends back "finished goods".

    From a lens manufacturing standpoint, the term "substrate" is both accurate and descriptive.
    Thanks for your answer RT. So this begs the question, if no treatment is applied to the lens, is it still accurate to refer to the lens as substrate?

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    3,089
    We also call the base lens a "substrate" when we laminate two disseparate materials together.

  12. #12
    Master OptiBoarder AngeHamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    2,375
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert_S View Post
    It's only referred to as substrate with regards to coating application, in which case the term is correct as the substrate in any chemical reaction is the material that is reacted upon.
    Bingo.
    I'm Andrew Hamm and I approve this message.

  13. #13
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    585
    Ok - So it sounds like when we are referring to a lens treatment, such as A/R, then we can refer to the lens as the substrate. But if we are referring to the entire composition that makes the entire optical mechanism, (e.g. A/R + Substrate ) we should refer to it as the lens, when referring the entire optical mechanism context, referring to it as the substrate would not be accurate?

  14. #14
    Master OptiBoarder Darryl Meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Kansas City, Kansas, United States
    Occupation
    Lens Manufacturer
    Posts
    3,700
    when referring the entire optical mechanism context, referring to it as the substrate would not be accurate?
    Correct. As Rick (RT) noted above, the term substrate refers to the "bare" lens blank, prior to the application of any coatings or treatments, or when specifically referring to the properties of the underlying lens blank after the application of any coatings or treatments.

    Best regards,
    Darryl
    Darryl J. Meister, ABOM

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Only City in the World built over a Volcano
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    12,996
    Why do some people refer to a lens as a lense?

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St. Cloud, Minnesota
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    3,089
    And the "substrate" can sometimes also be referred to as a "carrier", just to mix it up a bit.

  17. #17
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by chip anderson View Post
    Why do some people refer to a lens as a lense?
    Chip, didn't your mother teach you that if you don't have anything nice to say to not say ......

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/lens

    Definition of LENS

    1: a curved piece of glass or plastic used singly or combined in eyeglasses or an optical instrument (as a microscope) for forming an image by focusing rays of light


    2: a device for directing or focusing radiation other than light (as sound waves, radio microwaves, or electrons)


    3: a highly transparent biconvex lens-shaped or nearly spherical body in the eye that focuses light rays entering the eye typically onto the retina, lies immediately behind the pupil, is made up of slender curved rod-shaped ectodermal cells in concentric lamellae surrounded by a tenuous mesoblastic capsule, and alters its focal length by becoming more or less spherical in response to the action of the ciliary muscle on a peripheral suspensory ligament

  18. #18
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeAurelius View Post
    And the "substrate" can sometimes also be referred to as a "carrier", just to mix it up a bit.
    Oh, now that is really confusing! I'll start with substrate first

  19. #19
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240
    Quote Originally Posted by chip anderson View Post

    Why do some people refer to a lens as a lense?

    ...............................because it could also be a lentille, or a linse

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Just substitute "eyeglasses" or "OTCs" for "umbrellas"
    By Barry Santini in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-28-2011, 01:27 PM
  2. "Indestructible" "LightWeight" NXT material frames
    By EyeGlassesGuy in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-22-2009, 02:43 PM
  3. Essilor's "New Improved" 1.60 Index Material
    By Metronome in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 09:16 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-24-2006, 01:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •