Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Question ?

  1. #1
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262

    Question ?

    I have a pt his Rx is:

    +0.25-0.50 60
    +0.25 -0.75 105
    +2.50 Add
    I have him in an Image. He didn't want to spent alot. HE says If he keeps one eye open at a time either eye, intermediate he can see. If he opens both eyes it's blurry. I have used this pal before and have not had a problem. Sght and pd are correct.

    Distance and reading are ok.

    Any ideas?

  2. #2
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Narnia
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    213
    how long has he been wearing and actually trying them for?

    have you tried lowering or raising the frame by a bit? just because the seg height is "on spec" doesn't mean it's sitting well for that particular patient.

    added a bit of panto/wrap?

    does he have one eye that sits higher or lower than the other?

    has he ever worn a PAL before?

  3. #3
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    He has had them for a week. The panto is 15. He has worn pals before w/ no issue. I did not do a wrap or tray one b/c it's the same frame. Eyes are at the same height.

  4. #4
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Narnia
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    213
    what was the rx he had in the frame before? What PAL was he wearing in the old frame and at what seg, and what seg is the Image at currently?

  5. #5
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    the old was
    00.00 -.50 30
    00.00 -.50 135
    2.00
    pd 33/33 sght 24 old pal was a varilux com. old rx was 2002

    Image at a 24

  6. #6
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Narnia
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    213
    why take him out of the Comfort?

  7. #7
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    He wanted cheap.

  8. #8
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Narnia
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    213
    well.... you may just have to explain to him that by keeping his old glasses for 10 years he's gotten himself well and truly used to the Comfort and he's going to have to pony up the difference. Either that or he doesn't like the cyl change and is going to have to give it another little while...

  9. #9
    ABOM Wes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    3,194
    Quote Originally Posted by B101875 View Post
    He wanted cheap.
    He got it!

    Cyls are not strong but they have a significant axis change. This could be it, but if he reports distance and near as ok, probably not.

    Never forget to take into account the patient's habits and how he has trained himself to use what he was wearing. That is the most often-missed troubleshoot I see, both in real life, and on Optiboard.

    Anyway, You just added a good bit of plus, enough that he had probably trained himself to look too far down the old lenses to see intermediate distances and now when he does it with the new pair, he's at reading distance. He also probably got comfortable with that wide reading area as his intermediate. He either needs to learn to use the new glasses properly (how far down the lens he looks, how much he converges), or if he's now uncomfortable with the much narrower intermediate, you can suggest a pair of "office" type lenses. Second pair sale! Woo hoo!
    Wesley S. Scott, MBA, MIS, ABOM, NCLE-AC, LDO - SC & GA

    “As our circle of knowledge expands, so does the circumference of darkness surrounding it.” -Albert Einstein

  10. #10
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Honduras
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    82
    Have you checked for unbalanced vertical prism

  11. #11
    Master OptiBoarder TLG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    S. California
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    814
    He's also gone from a +2.00 add to a +2.50; his reading area just shrunk and my experience with Image (love this lens for certain applications) is that it has a fairly narrow reading area as well. My suspicion is that the corridor width is narrower too - especially compared to his Comforts.

    I would also remark the engravings and lay them along a straight edge to make sure all 4 are in line. With a narrow corridor, if the lens gets rotated some it may move it away from the intended position. Be aware of how his head is rotated too when he 'can' see for each eye. You'd be amazed how much you can widen a field of view (or narrow) with a relatively slight rotation of the lens.

    And tell him to keep BOTH eyes open for cryin' out loud!! Like this , not like this - then maybe he can get rid of this . Sorry, couldn't resist "Fun With Smilies"

  12. #12
    Master OptiBoarder cleyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Yonkers, NY
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    768
    Quote Originally Posted by Wes View Post
    He got it!

    Cyls are not strong but they have a significant axis change. This could be it, but if he reports distance and near as ok, probably not.

    Never forget to take into account the patient's habits and how he has trained himself to use what he was wearing. That is the most often-missed troubleshoot I see, both in real life, and on Optiboard.

    Anyway, You just added a good bit of plus, enough that he had probably trained himself to look too far down the old lenses to see intermediate distances and now when he does it with the new pair, he's at reading distance. He also probably got comfortable with that wide reading area as his intermediate. He either needs to learn to use the new glasses properly (how far down the lens he looks, how much he converges), or if he's now uncomfortable with the much narrower intermediate, you can suggest a pair of "office" type lenses. Second pair sale! Woo hoo!
    Agree, most common problem when rx change has more +....patients are never warned/explained about this by their ECP.
    WE SEE THINGS NOT AS THEY ARE, BUT AS WE ARE..... Anais Nin

  13. #13
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    Well I spoke to the good Doc this morning for his input. He thinks it might be a muscle inbalance. So I called him back in for a recheck. We will see how this goes. The Doc was not to happy when I asked if he could bump the cyl a little. He says he hates the Image. I have fitted it for years and found it to be a good low cost pal.

  14. #14
    Doh! braheem24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    KOCF & 89ft ASL
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    3,843
    If you're going the imbalance route,

    The only real variance in the near was a +0.75 bump in the near which would require the patient to hold the reading material closer which in turn requires the eyes to converge more if BI prism held over his current glasses does not solve the problem it's a non-adapt issue.

  15. #15
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Morgantown.WV
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    494
    The first thing I would check out is if the lab did prism thinning on one lens, but not the other, making vertical prism. Tito elluded to that previously. I also agree with those who said increasing plus on a hyperope typically causes issues, whether the refraction indicates the need for it or not.

  16. #16
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    The prism in the pal is:
    OD: 2 down 1 out OS: 2 down

  17. #17
    Doh! braheem24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    KOCF & 89ft ASL
    Occupation
    Other Eyecare-Related Field
    Posts
    3,843
    The 1 out OS is making the convergence to the closer focal length worse.

  18. #18
    Manuf. Lens Surface Treatments
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Naples FL for the Winter months
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    23,240

    Blue Jumper

    The patient is at the maximum addition which gives the a narrowest proghressive area. At a 2.50 add most people are in retirement age group. So there are 2 factors,
    the smallest and shortest progerssion and reading area, plus the age where adaption is a problem if they are fitted properly. Change the for straight tops.

  19. #19
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Quote Originally Posted by B101875 View Post
    The prism in the pal is:
    OD: 2 down 1 out OS: 2 down
    That 1 D B/Out is enough to move the virtual lens too far out. He is losing binocular symmetry, which is usually manifested in good distance and reading but poor intermediate vision.

  20. #20
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    Got to love those VSP labs. Thanks Sharpstick.

  21. #21
    One eye sees, the other feels OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Wauwatosa Wi
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,469
    Quote Originally Posted by B101875 View Post
    He wanted cheap.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wes View Post
    He got it!
    Without getting into the tricky stuff (PAL horizontal asymmetry, oblique cyl axis, incipient cataracts, etc.), and giving consideration to your client's eyeglass budget, I'd recommend wearing the eyeglasses for ten days to see if the problem resolves, or at least improves and becomes tolerable. And as Wes says, if your client's intermediate needs are greater than occasional glances at teh dashboard and grocery shelves, supply task specific eyeglasses to supplement the general purpose eyeglasses.
    Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. - Richard P. Feynman

    Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test before the lesson.



  22. #22
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fort Myers, Fl
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    262
    He's and architect and a pain. Just waiting for the good Doc to do his Rx check. We have had a couple of changes b/c of Rx's. I will repost what happens.

  23. #23
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Sunny Southern Cali
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    598
    If he's an architect, he should understand about how price and quality work. Tell him he's trading in his brick house for a wood one.

  24. #24
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    3,137
    Or how he is using T111 instead of Cedar...

  25. #25
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    washington
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,916
    I think the combo of more plus in the distance, plus more plus in the near, plus the inbalance in the prism refrence point, plus the change in progressives, is the problem. Do you have any alternative lost cost PAL's that you could switch him to when he gets his rx check? Also, if his rx doesn't change, I would call the lab and get a redo anyways because of the imbalance. You may be able to put him into a Natural. I think they are still making those, and they are very similar to the original Comfort, or you could try the ever popular ovation.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-29-2010, 04:52 PM
  2. This question goes out to O.D.'s:
    By eyecarepro in forum The Job Board
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 03:31 PM
  3. Question about AR
    By EyeFitWell in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 06-20-2007, 03:19 PM
  4. New here with a question
    By hackey100 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-25-2006, 01:03 PM
  5. question
    By ziggy in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-21-2006, 07:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •