I don't normally pay attention to ads on sites, and this article was the same, however when I went to close the tab after reading it, I'm almost 100% positive I saw "3 for 1" on the ad at the top of the page with a brown haird woman wearing a pair of black semi-rimless glasses. I spent a few minutes refreshing to see if I could get it again, but it never showed up... maybe I was just imagining it, but I don't think I was. :\
You have got to wonder why the Creditors like one of the Colleges or the Attorney General did not sieze the assets like the name and logo. That was incredibly silly . After that whole court case and the number of years of defiance they still learned absolutely nothing. Their trust factor goes beyond all reasonable belief.
I wonder if the BC Colleges will do their job and constantly inform the public about licensing for refraction if their laws will even hold up for that ?
Last edited by idispense; 03-23-2012 at 08:36 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)