What is the difference in the lens design between the GT2 3D and the Reveal Free Form VI. I know the reveal is a free form design and the GT2 3D is not however how do they differ in the lens design?
What is the difference in the lens design between the GT2 3D and the Reveal Free Form VI. I know the reveal is a free form design and the GT2 3D is not however how do they differ in the lens design?
Zeiss Platform vs. Sola Platform. All from the same place but different divisions. The Free Form VI would be a little closer to the 3DV as it is a variable corridor. Think Sola HDV vs. Zeiss 3DV.
-Tony
I asked the same same question of my rep, who responded that the Reveal is designed with a wider intermediate, the GT2 3D wider distance (harder design??).
The Reveal FF is corridor adjusted to the b measurement of the frame, where the GT2 3D gives you a choice of short 14 or long 17 fitting height.
I studied the GT2 3D and realized that it is an evolution of the GT2. It therefore maintains the database of Zeiss.
In Brazil there isn´t Reveal, but when a PAL is offered with two minimum heights possible does not mean it is superior to another. One should be careful with these Free Form a minimum height of 14 mm since add 2.00 they also have high levels of induced astigmatism, are adapted to fit the frame
The GT2-3D is a full backside Free-form lens. The differences between the two are the pattern. The GT2-3D is a V shaped drop with great distance, good intermediate but with narrow reading. The Reveal is T design, wide distance, narrow intermediate, but OK reading.
It depends on what your patient needs, but the GT-3D is great for cel phone or laptop users, the intermediate is wide but very low. Not so good for PC's or heavy readers.
Do not drop your dot on the GT2-3D, its fatal for that lens. All Zeiss lenses should be dotted on the pupil center.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks