Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Fingerprint, special watermark .... or defect , on freeform PAL

  1. #1
    Rising Star mauroventura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Italia
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    77

    Fingerprint, special watermark .... or defect , on freeform PAL

    Hi to everyone.
    Sometime , looking freeform PAL ,coming from different customers ,(coated and uncoated), near at the lens geometric center ,shows some regular deformations shaped like concentric circles very difficult to see but presents , especially and more evident on positives ones.
    This circles coincide with the geometric center of the lens.

    Because this strange thing comes from different kind of PALS i think it could be originated by a construction limit.

    No one has ever encountered this type of defect?

  2. #2
    Objection! OptiBoard Gold Supporter shanbaum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Manchester, CT USA
    Occupation
    Other Optical Manufacturer or Vendor
    Posts
    2,976
    You may be seeing the bane of digital surfacing - the "center artifact". All generators that cut in a spiral pattern - which includes all freeform generators, now that OptoTech has abandoned their raster-cut approach in favor of spiral turning - are vulnerable to a problem at the center of the spiral, where the surface velocity of the cutter approaches zero. In traditional surfacing, the artifact is eliminated during the fining step; but in digital surfacing, there is no fining step. Digitial generators, therefore, have to be very carefully calibrated, or you'll end up with a peak or a divot (created in an effort to avoid creating a peak) at the surface block center. That's one good reason to locate the PRP (and the other design features) somewhere else, as many designs do.

  3. #3
    Rising Star mauroventura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Italia
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    77
    Thank you Shanbaum , for the interesting explanation.
    It seems ,a problem , without solution.

    thanks

  4. #4
    Master OptiBoarder optical24/7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Down on the Farm
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    5,831
    Many/most labs use a heavy lacquer hardcoat to mask FF surfacing marks.

  5. #5
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    1,012
    Trivex is good for this. Whatever happened to good surfacing technique. I've always been a little leery about the generator-to-polish systems.
    Clinton Tower

    The intellect to live free is in short supply
    ALT248=°

  6. #6
    Rising Star mauroventura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Italia
    Occupation
    Optical Laboratory Technician
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by optical24/7 View Post
    Many/most labs use a heavy lacquer hardcoat to mask FF surfacing marks.
    Could be a choice !
    Anyway , we must remember that normally a good hardcoat thickness using commercial laquers must be around 2.5-3 microns, and i suspect that a hardcoat layer of 3 o 4 microns (.. or more) it's not enough thick to cover this problem.
    We must remember also that to play with hardocoat layer could have strong impact on final lens quality and then this way can require time to develop a new coating structure.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Question about Luxottica Product defect/return warrenty
    By GOS_Queen in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-15-2011, 04:19 PM
  2. Defect on 1.67 lenses after curing
    By Srejicaleks in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-17-2010, 11:27 AM
  3. Special skills
    By Mizikal in forum Just Conversation
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-22-2010, 08:03 AM
  4. Sister, you gotta frame finish defect cover-upper?
    By drk in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 12:21 PM
  5. AR coated lens has thumbprint defect
    By rdcoach5 in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-29-2009, 11:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •