Originally Posted by
AdmiralKnight
I'm not quite following the logic... the way I look at is like this. Take safety frames. If you put non-safety lenses into a safety frame, they're not safety glasses, right? Well, if you don't put rx lenses into a frame, it shouldn't be exempted from taxes for that reason.
That being said, there are going to be situations where getting a frame only would be able to submit to insurance, for instance, if a patient was getting a new frame, putting existing lenses in, some insurance plans will cover that.
Now, obviously, I have no idea how the actual law works, but that's my take on it. :D
Bookmarks