Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Nikon Seemax 1.60 single vision

  1. #1
    OptiBoard Novice
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    England
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    2

    Nikon Seemax 1.60 single vision

    R-5.75/+2.25x100
    L-5.50/+1.50x100

    I have a px wearing the above rx in Nikon Seemax 1.60 sv.

    The right lens gives him perfect vision, however he has a complaint with the left:
    Straight ahead; perfect
    Looking to the nasal; perfect
    Looking to the temple; he gets what he describes as a line or band on the lens where the vision is not clear. When he gets past this 'band' and into the periphery sharpness returns.

    I have checked and double checked everything: rx, centration, compared to previous rx & centration, fit, panto, apical, taken v-values into account. I'm stumped. Sounds almost like a ring scotoma from an old lenticular but it couldn't be that.

    Any suggestions??

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi, United States
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    12,613
    Have you tried holding the lens at arms length and looking at a distant tube light. Rotate, twist, wiggle, bet there is some abberration there.
    A colmascope might also reveal some stress in the lens.

    Chip
    "The trouble with America is Them! A. Bunker

  3. #3
    Underemployed Genius Jacqui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Frostbite Falls, Mn.
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    6,564
    Blog Entries
    2
    I was thinking maybe a bad lens.
    "Man who say it cannot be done, should not interrupt woman doing it" - Confusious

    Proud Member of the ABE Club!
    Don't feed the Beast...

  4. #4
    Master OptiBoarder Crazy-bout-Optics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    La La Land
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    450
    The only time I have encountered this, there was peripheral blur on both lenses. I'e only noticed this with Aspheric lenses that were either fit wrong, or the pt does not tolerate the change in base curve. Pts with + Rx's seem to have no problem, but those moderate myopes out there are the ones I run into trouble with. Have Pd's changed form previous pair? I am sure you've checked everything. Either Pt cannot tolerate an Aspheric lens in the OS, or its a bad lens. If the last lenses were Aspheric, I'd say its a bad lens.

    ~Crazy

  5. #5
    Master OptiBoarder
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi, United States
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    12,613
    Doan "bad lens" translate "aberrated?"
    "The trouble with America is Them! A. Bunker

  6. #6
    Master OptiBoarder OptiBoard Silver Supporter
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Occupation
    Optical Wholesale Lab (other positions)
    Posts
    1,582
    Could also be a coating flaw... I have had a few that I could not see unless the lens was held at the correct distance and at the correct angle. With some of the A/R's with over 45 layers it only takes one mess up to create a "ripple" in the lens.

    Just redo it...

    Sharpstick

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nikon 4 vs. Nikon Seemax vs. Essilor Fusio
    By mlm in forum Canadian Discussion Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-24-2010, 11:05 PM
  2. Polycarbonate Single Vision
    By DocInChina in forum Optical Marketplace
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2005, 04:55 PM
  3. Single Vision Hi Index Aspherics
    By Bev Heishman in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-24-2002, 08:49 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
OptiBoard is proudly sponsored by:
Younger Optics, Carl Zeiss Vision, VisionWeb, and Vision Systems, Inc.