You guys really have no idea what is required to get through OD school or the volume of knowledge one has to obtain just to graduate. That's why OD read posts like that and chuckle a bit.
The only problem with what you're suggesting is that it's silly to obtain the necessary education to merely be able to diagnose. You have to clearly understand the mechanism of disease to be able to properly diagnose. Hell, half of the time the diagnosing is the hard part. Once you nail it down, the treatments are generally straight forward. Unless you're suggesting that by diagnosing we simply say "here is something that shouldn't be, but I don't have a clue what".
The only people that really have any valid opinion are those that have been opticians and then gone to optometry school. THOSE are the folks that I would like to hear from.
Bookmarks