Chic:
Bumping add, helps a little but it also reduces reading area more and squishes the intermeadiate even more. And I ment 80% of add power, not reading area (which is also greatly reduced.)
Chip
Chic:
Bumping add, helps a little but it also reduces reading area more and squishes the intermeadiate even more. And I ment 80% of add power, not reading area (which is also greatly reduced.)
Chip
Wow, this is an old thread. Now they have the Comfort Short and the New Comfort.
We have had good luck with the Youger Image at 18 high. That design gives a really nice mid-range. As long as you have at least 10mm at the top for distance, your comfort should work too!
Creed? No, I don't believe it. Once you hear Leo Sayer, you ripped off the dial and have been listening ever since.
Ophthalmic Optician, Society to Advance Opticianry
Funny thread rebirth! When A/O came out with the Compact Varilux started gettin their butts wooped in sales with the smaller "B" sizes. Suddenly their reps started talking about how it was JUST FINE to fit 'em at 18!! I remember cracking up about it back then. What dorks!
Chris Beard
The State of Jefferson !
I'm a Medford man – Medford, Oregon. Up in Medford, we take our time making up our minds."
I always focimeter a progressive before edging, and note exactly where the full add is, to make sure it will fit in. It's often not in the designated area; sometimes above and sometimes below. I also note where the proper distance prescription is, and I will often adjust accordingly. With this technique you can't really go wrong.
Yes, all the time. Do you always fit progressives with the fitting cross exactly on the pupil?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks