I don't know if this has already been discussed, but I was wondering everyone's views about the Unique progressive compared to the Physio.
I don't know if this has already been discussed, but I was wondering everyone's views about the Unique progressive compared to the Physio.
I don't have any direct experience with either, but are you trying to compare the Unique to the standard Physio or the Physio 360?
I wanted to see what other opticians thought about the lens, compared to the Physio, whether they thought if was better, the same or not so good.
Are you talking regular Physio or the 360 though?
There is a difference when you are comparing an indvidualized lens such as the Unique and the 360 to a traditional design such as the Physio.
Cassandra
"Some believe in destiny, and some believe in fate. But I believe that happiness is something we create."-Something More by Sugarland
I think this question from spongiebrownie points out the problem with trying to compare lens designs. If the person comparing the lens designs is not even familiar with the name and basic method of manufacture it is difficult to have any meaningful comparision.
Shouldn't the design be at least as important as either the name and method of manufacture?
RT
]]
Last edited by Refractingoptician.com; 03-02-2007 at 12:15 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks