Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 104 of 104

Thread: Phoropter debate - refractive distance

  1. #101
    OptiBoardaholic
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    238
    As a side note, we should probably just let this thread die!

  2. #102
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    cyber world
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    230
    Quote Originally Posted by Darryl Meister
    Flat transposition is transposition involving just the prescription, without regard to lens surfaces or physical cylinder form (which would be toric transposition). It doesn't matter, for instance, whether you fill a -2.00 +1.00 x 090 Rx using a front (plus) or back (minus) cylinder; the prescription is still the same. The dioptric power matrix is a method of decomposing a prescription into a 2x2 matrix, which offers several advantages in vision science and visual optics.
    Can you put it this way- Flat transposition = optical prescription transposition.
    Toric transposition = surface transposition

    I am not yet an optician, just learner so please bear mistakes.

  3. #103
    Master OptiBoarder Darryl Meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Kansas City, Kansas, United States
    Occupation
    Lens Manufacturer
    Posts
    3,700
    I think your 2x2 matrix is similar to what I was taught as a "sphero-cylinder cross" diagram, but I'm not sure. Do you have any links to that concept?
    If you do a search on Google for "dioptric power matrix," it will actually turn up quite a few links (unfortunately, many of the articles that use this terminology appear in vision science journals, which typical require a subscription).

    The elements of the 2x2 dioptic power matrix can be computed from an ordinary prescription using these formulas:

    Px = S + C sin^2 A
    Py = S + C cos^2 A
    Pt = -C sin A cos A
    Pt = -C sin A cos A

    Px represents the curvital power through the horizontal meridian, and Py represents the curvital power through the vertical meridian. This is essentially the "sine-squared" power through these meridians. Pt represents the torsional component of power, and is essentially a measure of how the power changes between these two meridians. (Note that the two Pt terms in the matrix are equivalent.)

    One of the advantages of using this representation of power, for instance, is that the matrices are additive, which means that you combine two prescriptions by just summing the elements of the matrices, without using additional formulas for combining obliquely crossed cylinders.
    Darryl J. Meister, ABOM

  4. #104
    Bad address email on file
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Folsom CA USA
    Occupation
    Optometrist
    Posts
    305
    Quote Originally Posted by SpecialT
    As a side note, we should probably just let this thread die!
    Ok I'm ready. Matrices are just not my thing...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Wanted Equipment Phoropter, SL Tonopen
    By lasik in forum Optical Marketplace
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-05-2006, 10:03 PM
  2. Refractive Technologies
    By Chris Ryser in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-18-2005, 10:49 AM
  3. lab ? prism in distance only of a Bifocal?
    By Refractingoptician.com in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-25-2003, 09:21 AM
  4. Near Interpupillary Distance
    By Edgley Gonzaga in forum Ophthalmic Optics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-03-2002, 06:11 PM
  5. Refractive Match Wanted !
    By sandeepgoodbole in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-21-2002, 10:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •