As a side note, we should probably just let this thread die!
As a side note, we should probably just let this thread die!
Can you put it this way- Flat transposition = optical prescription transposition.Originally Posted by Darryl Meister
Toric transposition = surface transposition
I am not yet an optician, just learner so please bear mistakes.
If you do a search on Google for "dioptric power matrix," it will actually turn up quite a few links (unfortunately, many of the articles that use this terminology appear in vision science journals, which typical require a subscription).I think your 2x2 matrix is similar to what I was taught as a "sphero-cylinder cross" diagram, but I'm not sure. Do you have any links to that concept?
The elements of the 2x2 dioptic power matrix can be computed from an ordinary prescription using these formulas:
Px = S + C sin^2 A
Py = S + C cos^2 A
Pt = -C sin A cos A
Pt = -C sin A cos A
Px represents the curvital power through the horizontal meridian, and Py represents the curvital power through the vertical meridian. This is essentially the "sine-squared" power through these meridians. Pt represents the torsional component of power, and is essentially a measure of how the power changes between these two meridians. (Note that the two Pt terms in the matrix are equivalent.)
One of the advantages of using this representation of power, for instance, is that the matrices are additive, which means that you combine two prescriptions by just summing the elements of the matrices, without using additional formulas for combining obliquely crossed cylinders.
Darryl J. Meister, ABOM
Ok I'm ready. Matrices are just not my thing...Originally Posted by SpecialT
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks