Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: On rimless frame, Varilux Panamic 1.6 versus Rodenstock Impression ILT XS 1.6

  1. #1
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    95

    On rimless frame, Varilux Panamic 1.6 versus Rodenstock Impression ILT XS 1.6

    I have been so busy with unexpected things that I haven't bought the rimless frame yet partly because of my hard drive failure and I need to do a bit more research to order it and I'd liek to do it form home.
    (I am reusing my current frame and making Shamirr Office - still haven't picked it up yet because everytime I have time to pick it up, the place is closed.)

    Q1:
    My info for rimless frame is scattered in my email and now I'd like to recap it. From what I remember, the best to buy is Silohuette Rimless with hinges, right?

    Q2:
    As for the lens, I had decided to do Varilux Panamic. Now I was suggested Varilux panamic Orma lens. I belive Orma is 1.67, right? (For AR. I'll put Crizal ALize')

    Q3:
    For sunglasses, is there a way (and would it be wise) to use a clip on with (is it even easy to find a suitable clip on like that; would it scratch the lens) my regular pair that would be made with rimless frame?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Master OptiBoarder Jedi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    1,509
    Q1:I prefer the Silhouette without hinges, but all the Minimal Art stuff from them is good.
    Q2:Orma is Cr-39, regular plastic.
    Q3:Silhouette has a clip that fit on the bridge of the Minimal Art series and can also be customized if you want a shape outside their offerings.
    "It's not impossible. I used to bull's-eye womp rats in my T-16 back home."


  3. #3
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Jedi
    Q1:I prefer the Silhouette without hinges, but all the Minimal Art stuff from them is good.
    I am after the strength of the frame to hold the lens. So should I get the one with hinges or the one w/o hinges? The reason I am buying rimless frame is that I gave up looking for the frame that has 18mm fitting ht required for Panamic. And I am buying online to save about $80.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedi
    Q2:Orma is Cr-39, regular plastic.
    I think I can only put poly or high index in rimless; Orma is out then. No poly for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedi
    Q3:Silhouette has a clip that fit on the bridge of the Minimal Art series and can also be customized if you want a shape outside their offerings.
    If I purchase online, will I be able to find the clip on? And who can customize the clip on for me?

  4. #4
    Master OptiBoarder Jedi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
    Occupation
    Ophthalmic Technician
    Posts
    1,509
    Quote Originally Posted by amanda
    I am after the strength of the frame to hold the lens. So should I get the one with hinges or the one w/o hinges?

    If I purchase online, will I be able to find the clip on? And who can customize the clip on for me?
    As far as strength goes, it really doesn't matter. In regards to the clip-on, I don't know, why don't you ask the place you are buying the frame from.
    I hope you do realize the Silhouette frames have multiple bridge and temple sizes. It's kind of tough to find the right size online. They also have an extensive selection of lens shapes, something only a experienced optician can help guide you through. Also don't be surprised if that $80 savings online is eaten up on the cost of drilling the lens. Most offices I've worked in include the cost of drilling in the frame price. When a client would bring in a 3 piece rimless from another source to have lenses mounted a drilling charge was added, $80 is not an unreasonable charge for that. Silhouette needs 8 holes drilled to mount lenses and ruining a lens can happen, hence the seemingly steep charge (doesn't even compare to the cost of a spoiled PAL). Personally a rimless frame is the last eyeglass frame I would ever buy online. Too many variables.
    "It's not impossible. I used to bull's-eye womp rats in my T-16 back home."


  5. #5
    Bad address email on file QDO1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,961
    the mounts are the same. As a person who wears both, and both have survived on me for at least 4 years with no problems, i would say it doesnt matter. Make sure you get a genuine silhouette frame, and not a copy - the sillouette frames are very very good


    the sprung one is trickier to look after when they are not on.. cant find a place in the car to put them when I slip some sunspex on, and the fitting is "different" I recommend you try both on, as, they do fit quite differently from each other, and you might find that you love one compared to the other

    BTW sillouette make clip on sunspex that match the lens shapes exactly, order it at the same time

  6. #6
    The Hi-End PALs Specialist Bobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Thailand
    Occupation
    Optical Retail
    Posts
    381

    Smilie Silhouette Titan Minimal Art

    1. Silhouette Titan Minimal Art is one of the best rimless frame.

    2. Varilux Panamic Orma is index 1.5. If you would like to going for 1.67 , you have to going for Varilux Panamic Stylis 1.67, but the ABBE of Stylis 1.67 is lower than Orma 1.5 about 40% ( Higer is better ).

    3. Silhouette Titan Minimal Art have original polarized clip-on that never scratch the surface of lenses.But I recommended you to choose 1.6/42 material that very strong for rimless.

    4. I recommended Rodenstcok Impression ILT XS 1.6/42 that cheaper than Varilux Panamic Airwear and much cheaper than Varilux Panamic Stylis 1.67.
    Impression ILT XS have much better vision for far like single vision , near and intermediate vision are about the same Panamic.
    " Life is too short to limit your vision"


    ISOPTIK : The Hi-End Eyeglasses Centre
    494 ERAWAN BANGKOK 4th floor
    Ratchaprasong , Bangkok , Thailand 10330
    isoptik@gmail.com
    www.isoptik.com
    Hotline & SMS : +66 81 538-4200
    Fax. : +66 2 251-3770

    :cheers:

  7. #7
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobie
    1. Silhouette Titan Minimal Art is one of the best rimless frame.

    2. Varilux Panamic Orma is index 1.5. If you would like to going for 1.67 , you have to going for Varilux Panamic Stylis 1.67, but the ABBE of Stylis 1.67 is lower than Orma 1.5 about 40% ( Higer is better ).

    3. Silhouette Titan Minimal Art have original polarized clip-on that never scratch the surface of lenses.But I recommended you to choose 1.6/42 material that very strong for rimless.
    What's 42 stands for? 1.6 irfers to index of lens, right?

    [QUOTE=Bobie]4. I recommended Rodenstcok Impression ILT XS 1.6/42 that cheaper than Varilux Panamic Airwear and much cheaper than Varilux Panamic Stylis 1.67.

    Varilux Panamic Airwear is polycarbonate, sin't it? What is 1.6/42 of Rodenstcok Impression ILT XS 1.6/42 stands for. Is it polycarbonate category?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobie
    Impression ILT XS have much better vision for far like single vision , near and intermediate vision are about the same Panamic.
    I like that. Can you tell me what 1.6/42 stands for?

  8. #8
    Bad address email on file QDO1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Occupation
    Dispensing Optician
    Posts
    1,961
    [QUOTE=amanda]What's 42 stands for? 1.6 irfers to index of lens, right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobie
    4. I recommended Rodenstcok Impression ILT XS 1.6/42 that cheaper than Varilux Panamic Airwear and much cheaper than Varilux Panamic Stylis 1.67.

    Varilux Panamic Airwear is polycarbonate, sin't it? What is 1.6/42 of Rodenstcok Impression ILT XS 1.6/42 stands for. Is it polycarbonate category?



    I like that. Can you tell me what 1.6/42 stands for?
    42 is the ABBE value which is a measure of dispersion. because it is actually an inverse function, the higher the value, the better the lens, the lower the number, the more the colours fringe, or split up - remember that experement with a wedge of glass in Physics - which makes a spectrum - well thats what we try to avoid, and ABBE is a measure of it

  9. #9
    Rising Star
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    95
    [QUOTE=QDO1]
    Quote Originally Posted by amanda
    What's 42 stands for? 1.6 irfers to index of lens, right?

    42 is the ABBE value which is a measure of dispersion. because it is actually an inverse function, the higher the value, the better the lens, the lower the number, the more the colours fringe, or split up - remember that experement with a wedge of glass in Physics - which makes a spectrum - well thats what we try to avoid, and ABBE is a measure of it
    Thanks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Good Men's Sunglasses?
    By Ryan in forum General Optics and Eyecare Discussion Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-17-2013, 11:12 AM
  2. Trial PALs in Trial Frame
    By Bobie in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-03-2006, 12:54 PM
  3. Non-professional seeking general advice on switching lens brands
    By Christina in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-01-2005, 06:17 AM
  4. Comfort Or Ellipse for dress pair and Panamic for sunglasses
    By amanda in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-01-2005, 04:53 AM
  5. PAL Design Comparisons??
    By Lady Nicole in forum Progressive Lens Discussion Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-30-2005, 07:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •