if you look o the 3 design above you se the first is grat and the next 2 i crab, you gain so liltle INTM and reading.
best regards
Peter
if you look o the 3 design above you se the first is grat and the next 2 i crab, you gain so liltle INTM and reading.
best regards
Peter
a few years later and now I no longer use any varilux products so many better lenses out there
This is a common refrain. I think the Auto II is a better lens, and a lot less expensive.
The other downside to the Ipseo is that Varilux uses it to test new Progressive technology before it works its way down to the other lenses in Varlilux's line. So the Ipseo you ordered last year may not match the Ipseo you order this week for the same patient. You will never know as they never tell you when the design has changed.
The other downside is that you are paying a premium to work as a test subject. It costs the same to make an Ipseo as it does any digitally processed lens. In any other industry, you would be paid to be part of an experiment, not pay for the priveledge.
I like new technology, but I want to know what design the lens is using, what its personality is, where its strong and where its weak. I would prefer that predictability and if it changes be notified (ie: Definity 2.0 and Auto 2.0). I don't like ambiguous technology.
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy ~Benjamin Franklin
Yeah, join Optical Resources and order a Hoya Amplitude HiDef with Hivision. You'll do much, much better on the bottom line and still provide your patients with the latest free form designs. I do give Varilux high marks for inventing terms like Wave Front Management System and Point by Point Twinning. That all sound great and gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. Too bad you have to pay extra for creativity.
what is it whit Hoya and the way therer lenses look after 3-4 years, slight yellow and no longer clear.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks